2014
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2014.961441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the axial and circumferential mechanical properties of the skin tissue using experimental testing and constitutive modeling

Abstract: The skin, being a multi-layered material, is responsible for protecting the human body from the mechanical, bacterial, and viral insults. The skin tissue may display different mechanical properties according to the anatomical locations of a body. However, these mechanical properties in different anatomical regions and at different loading directions (axial and circumferential) of the mice body to date have not been determined. In this study, the axial and circumferential loads were imposed on the mice skin sam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been some reports on the measurement of the mechanical properties of the rat and mice skin tissues using uniaxial 18,26 or biaxial 27,28 tensile tests. However, so far no study has investigated the anisotropic mechanical properties of the rat and mice skin tissues at different anatomical locations of their body, i.e., abdomen and back, using histostructural and uniaxial extension data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have been some reports on the measurement of the mechanical properties of the rat and mice skin tissues using uniaxial 18,26 or biaxial 27,28 tensile tests. However, so far no study has investigated the anisotropic mechanical properties of the rat and mice skin tissues at different anatomical locations of their body, i.e., abdomen and back, using histostructural and uniaxial extension data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, so far no study has investigated the anisotropic mechanical properties of the rat and mice skin tissues at different anatomical locations of their body, i.e., abdomen and back, using histostructural and uniaxial extension data. There have been some studies which used Ogden, 18 Neo-Hookean, 17 Mooney-Rivlin, 26 and Fung-type 29,30 material model to address the nonlinear mechanical behavior of the skin tissue. However, none of those studies implemented the role of fiber orientations into a constitutive equation to capture the anisotropic nonlinear mechanical properties of the skin tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) resulted to have a high variability, and demonstrated the pronounced anisotropy of the tissue, since CC and the ML directions have produced very different responses; as a consequence, anisotropic hyper-elastic material models were expected to be more adequate to reproduce dermis response. Two anisotropic hyper-elastic constitutive laws were selected, which had been developed for modelling arterial walls but can be adapted to any soft tissue, together with an isotropic hyper-elastic model which still finds application in soft tissues modelling [10], [19]. The isotropic Ogden model strain energy function presents as follows:…”
Section: Experimental Biaxial Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical methods applied to soft biological tissues have considerably spread recently, and, as a consequence, hyper-elastic anisotropic constitutive formulations have been implemented in commercial FE codes. Although nonlinear isotropic material models such as the Ogden, Mooney-Rivlin and Neo-Hookean ones have been used to describe the mechanical response of skin [9], [10], [19], more adequate anisotropic structural formulations, i.e. accounting for the real collagenous structure of soft tissues, have recently been developed [7], [15], [16], [20], [21], which more coherently represent their mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements on ex vivo animal skin were performed abundantly, mostly in uniaxial (Groves et al, 2013;Li and Xiaoyu, 2016;Lokshin and Lanir, 2009a;Bischoff, 2006;Karimi et al, 2015Karimi et al, , 2016Limbert, 2011) tests and a single multiaxial (Jor et al, 2011) tensile test. However, because of the well-known anatomical, biological and mechanical differences, it is difficult to translate these results to human skin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%