2010
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Brain–Blood Partition Coefficient for Water in Mice Using MRI

Abstract: Cerebral blood flow (CBF) quantification is a valuable tool in stroke research. Mice are of special interest because of the potential of genetic engineering. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides repetitive, noninvasive CBF quantification. Many MRI techniques require the knowledge of the brain-blood partition coefficient (BBPC) for water. Adopting an MRI protocol described by Roberts et al (1996) in humans, we determined the BBPC for water in 129S6/SvEv mice from proton density measurements of brain and bl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The animals were anesthetized with isoflurane administered through a facemask and adjusted to maintain respiratory rate in the physiologic range following published protocols. 27 Body temperature was maintained at 37°C using a heading pad. A 30-cm horizontal bore Bruker Biospin magnet operating at 7 T (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used with a S116 gradient set.…”
Section: Arterial Spin Labeling Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The animals were anesthetized with isoflurane administered through a facemask and adjusted to maintain respiratory rate in the physiologic range following published protocols. 27 Body temperature was maintained at 37°C using a heading pad. A 30-cm horizontal bore Bruker Biospin magnet operating at 7 T (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used with a S116 gradient set.…”
Section: Arterial Spin Labeling Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ∆M(t) is the tissue magnetization difference between the control and label images during the interval t, M 0B is the equilibrium magnetization of arterial blood assumed to be the same as the tissue M0 obtained from the T1 mapping, α is the labeling efficiency assumed to be 0.9, λ is the tissue/blood partition coefficient of water assumed to be 0.9ml/g [31], ∆t is arterial transit time to be fitted, τ is the labeling duration (1600ms in our sequence), T' 1 is the apparent relaxation time measured by the T 1 mapping, T 1b is the longitudinal relaxation time of arterial blood assumed to be 2300ms [32]. The goodness of fitting for CBF quantification was evaluated by the coefficient of determination, R 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of the inversion efficiency was assumed to be alpha = 0.7 [19], [20]. In close approximation to the value recently reported by Leithner et al for the mouse brain [21] the brain-blood partition coefficient value for water was assumed to be lambda = 0.90 mL/g. Slice selective T1 mapping was measured with a single slice partial saturation inversion recovery RARE sequence (TI of 0.02 s, 0.5 s, 1.0 s, 1.5 s, 2.0 s, 3.0 s, 5.0 s, 10.0 s).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%