1980
DOI: 10.1002/ijch.198000029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Charge Distribution in Nonmetallic Crystals II. Compounds with d‐orbitals. Corundum

Abstract: Abstract. A S.C.F. method using localized molecular orbitals, previously proposed to determine net charges in zincblende-and wurtzite-type crystals, has been adapted to the corundum case (AI 203-a )~. The presence of d -orbitals in hybrid atomic orbitals and the difference between coordination numbers give rise to some problems. Then, the choice of Slater-type orbital exponents, the introduction of corrective factors in the calculation of charges, the molecular orbitals orthogonalization and the introduction o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the band-structure calculation of Ciraci & Batra (1983) the A1 charge was + 1. The study of Julg, Pellegatti & Marinelli (1980) by a self-consistent field method gives an A1 charge of + 0.57, and + 0.33 was obtained from an empirical relation connecting hardness and ionicity of a crystal. On the other hand, the cluster MSX,~ approach (Nagel, 1985) gave +2.57 and an ab initio calculation (Salasco, Dovesi, Orlando, Causa' & Saunders, 1991) gave + 1.78.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the band-structure calculation of Ciraci & Batra (1983) the A1 charge was + 1. The study of Julg, Pellegatti & Marinelli (1980) by a self-consistent field method gives an A1 charge of + 0.57, and + 0.33 was obtained from an empirical relation connecting hardness and ionicity of a crystal. On the other hand, the cluster MSX,~ approach (Nagel, 1985) gave +2.57 and an ab initio calculation (Salasco, Dovesi, Orlando, Causa' & Saunders, 1991) gave + 1.78.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%