1983
DOI: 10.1021/ac00253a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the efficiency of the graphite furnace for atomic absorption spectrometry

Abstract: Atomic Numberif longer time was used, the predicted values would degrade, for this comparison, by the square root of the ratio of times.In any case, it should be obvious that the experimental results show that the predictions were not overly optimistic. This work will be extended to include the use of monochromatic radiation. The reduction in incident intensity will be weighed against the tunability and lower background. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Special thanks are given to Alan Webb for assistance with the experimental … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, before comparison can be made, it must be noted that the efficiency values determined in this study were for the HGA-400, and were only applicable under the specific experimental conditions, especially the heating rates used in this work. The most important difference between this work and those of the above authors was that the heating rates used in this work were much higher (Table 2) than those used by the above authors (1,2). Regardless of whether atomization was isothermal or nonisothermal, higher heating rates increased k I values much more than k 2 values, and hence decreased t,;,, values by eq.…”
Section: Comparison With the Atornization Eflciency Values Reported Bymentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, before comparison can be made, it must be noted that the efficiency values determined in this study were for the HGA-400, and were only applicable under the specific experimental conditions, especially the heating rates used in this work. The most important difference between this work and those of the above authors was that the heating rates used in this work were much higher (Table 2) than those used by the above authors (1,2). Regardless of whether atomization was isothermal or nonisothermal, higher heating rates increased k I values much more than k 2 values, and hence decreased t,;,, values by eq.…”
Section: Comparison With the Atornization Eflciency Values Reported Bymentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Atomization efficiencies of some commercial graphite furnaces have been studied by several authors (1)(2)(3)(4). However, the differences in the published results of different authors indicate that the problem of atomization efficiency still remains unresolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…245.1 kJ mol-'. The formation of the gaseous oxide (GaO) may explain the relatively low atomization efficiency of galliuin (38).…”
Section: Gnlli~rrnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical sensitivity calculations for some analytes in commercial graphite furnaces have been made by van den Broek and de Galan [12], Sturgeon and Berman [13], and Magyar [14]. In some of these papers, the authors evaluated the overall efficiency of the vapor content and atomization in the furnace by the measurement of peak height absorbance and applying wall atomization [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some of these papers, the authors evaluated the overall efficiency of the vapor content and atomization in the furnace by the measurement of peak height absorbance and applying wall atomization [12,13]. However, early atomizer designs applied in these works were far of the spatially isothermal ones and also handicapped by the relatively slow heating, which is the main drawback when peak height absorbance is evaluated [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%