2005
DOI: 10.1581/mrcas.2005.010308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the elasticity parameters of brain tissue with combined simulation and registration

Abstract: Reliable elasticity parameters describing the behavior of a given material are an important issue in the context of physically-based simulation. In this paper we introduce a method for the determination of the mechanical properties of brain tissue. Elasticity parameters Young's modulus E and Poisson's ratio u are estimated in an iterative framework coupling a finite element simulation with image registration. Within this framework, the outcome of the simulation is parameterized with both elasticity moduli that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with coronary arteries (E ϭ 16.8 kPa, ϭ 0.499), 18 arteries within the brain have different mechanical properties (E ϭ 9.2 kPa, ϭ 0.458). 19 With a lower Young modulus and Poisson ratio, along with differences in the perivascular environment of the intracranial arteries, it can be assumed that larger deformation post-stent placement will occur compared with coronary arteries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with coronary arteries (E ϭ 16.8 kPa, ϭ 0.499), 18 arteries within the brain have different mechanical properties (E ϭ 9.2 kPa, ϭ 0.458). 19 With a lower Young modulus and Poisson ratio, along with differences in the perivascular environment of the intracranial arteries, it can be assumed that larger deformation post-stent placement will occur compared with coronary arteries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from polyimide and parylene) have been developed [13,[19][20][21], reducing the probe stiffness by approximately two orders of magnitude compared to Si. However, as Young's modulus of brain tissue is ∼10 kPa [22][23][24], and the polymer-based probes have a modulus of ∼2.5 GPa, the mechanical mismatch is still considerable. Further, the overall stiffness of the conventional polymerbased probes is too low to penetrate the brain without buckling, unless stiff backbones [13] or gel-filled microfluidic channels are used [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in vivo values strongly depend on frequency, the values used in this work are comparable to those found in in vivo tissues. [50][51][52][53] The results shown in Figs. 4, 5, and 7 and Table II demonstrate the ability of the technique to predict the magnitude of the displacement as well as the overall shape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%