2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13139-022-00736-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Estrogen Receptor Status of Leptomeningeal Metastasis in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Using [18F]-FES PET/CT: a Case Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the practice guideline for ER imaging of patients with breast cancer using 18 F-FES PET, approved in June 2023 by Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI)/European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), common clinical indications include: (1) assessing lesions that are difficult to biopsy or yield non-diagnostic results after biopsy, (2) guiding therapy after the progression of metastases, (3) guiding therapy at the initial presentation of metastases, and (4) detecting cancer with ER expression when other imaging tests are equivocal or suspicious for cancer [51,52]. Other emerging indications under investigation are as follows: (1) detecting ER-expressing lesions in patients with suspected or known recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, (2) assessing ER status, instead of biopsy, in lesions that are easily accessible for biopsy, (3) staging invasive lobular breast cancer and low-grade ER-expressing invasive ductal cancer, (4) routinely staging extra-axillary nodes and distant metastases to evaluate ER-expression [53].…”
Section: Estrogen Receptor (Er)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the practice guideline for ER imaging of patients with breast cancer using 18 F-FES PET, approved in June 2023 by Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI)/European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), common clinical indications include: (1) assessing lesions that are difficult to biopsy or yield non-diagnostic results after biopsy, (2) guiding therapy after the progression of metastases, (3) guiding therapy at the initial presentation of metastases, and (4) detecting cancer with ER expression when other imaging tests are equivocal or suspicious for cancer [51,52]. Other emerging indications under investigation are as follows: (1) detecting ER-expressing lesions in patients with suspected or known recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, (2) assessing ER status, instead of biopsy, in lesions that are easily accessible for biopsy, (3) staging invasive lobular breast cancer and low-grade ER-expressing invasive ductal cancer, (4) routinely staging extra-axillary nodes and distant metastases to evaluate ER-expression [53].…”
Section: Estrogen Receptor (Er)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we can try to combine the two and learn from each other's strengths to offset our weaknesses. For example, the physiological uptake of 18 F-FDG in the head is higher, while the uptake of 18 F-FES in the liver is extremely high, so the combination of the two can make up for their respective defects [39] [40] [41]. And due to the existence of ER-negative lesions, the information of 18 F-FESPET/CT imaging alone is limited, so it may be an inevitable trend to combine 18 F-FDGPET/CT at the first examination.…”
Section: A Comparative Study Of Diagnostic Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%