2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the gross heat input in arc welding

Abstract: a b s t r a c tA method to expurgate intrinsic errors from cryogenic calorimetric measurements is described. The sources of errors were identified and experimental procedures were devised to expurgate quantitatively the deviations from the true values, using extrapolation and linearization techniques. The methodology was applied to a case of MIG/MAG welding of carbon steel. The outcome of this approach represents the actual heat input (referred to here as gross heat input) and evidences that the commonly accep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
11
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure applied to determine these actual welding thermal cycles is summarized as follows (more details can be found at Mishchenko [20]): [21]) multiplied by a thermal efficiency factor (g t ). However, intrinsic errors and difficulties to measure thermal efficiency have been demonstrated by Liskevych and Scotti [22] and Hurtig et al [23]. For this reason, and considering the use of resultant actual weld cross sections, in this work the heat input-related input parameter used in Rosenthal's equations is replaced by arc energy (q/v); (d) With the input parameters, the heating and cooling times and peak temperature profiles are traced for each desirable condition; (e) In order to facilitate script programming on Gleeble, the thermal cycle generated is discretized in linear stretches, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Thermal Cycle Parameterization and Scriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure applied to determine these actual welding thermal cycles is summarized as follows (more details can be found at Mishchenko [20]): [21]) multiplied by a thermal efficiency factor (g t ). However, intrinsic errors and difficulties to measure thermal efficiency have been demonstrated by Liskevych and Scotti [22] and Hurtig et al [23]. For this reason, and considering the use of resultant actual weld cross sections, in this work the heat input-related input parameter used in Rosenthal's equations is replaced by arc energy (q/v); (d) With the input parameters, the heating and cooling times and peak temperature profiles are traced for each desirable condition; (e) In order to facilitate script programming on Gleeble, the thermal cycle generated is discretized in linear stretches, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Thermal Cycle Parameterization and Scriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though being aware of the limitations of calorimetric methods for heat input measurement, as stated by Hurtig et al [11] and Liskevych et al [12], a fully automated cryogenic calorimeter, as described by Liskevych and Scotti [13], was used. Different from that recommended in the latter citation, all comparisons were carried out following just one test condition to economize resources, i.e.…”
Section: Stage 2: Constant × Pulsed Current In Gtaw Supported By Calomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long welding time prolongs the period for the formation of aluminum‐rich intermetallic compounds . It was stated that measurable heat input using calorimetric methods corresponds only to absorbed heat by the base material . Since more energy is supplied to the arc parallel with increasing the heat input, the weld bead is enlarged, which results in decreased toughness of welded area .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%