2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the high strain rate fracture properties of ductile materials using a combined experimental/numerical approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tables 4 and 5 present the results of tests for the specimens with notches in different shapes as well as the averaged values of the four specimens: the maximum displacement u c and critical force F c . Figures 6,7,8,9,10,11,12 and 13 show the dependence of the tensile force F and extensometer displacement u for constant radius r K , while Figs. 14, 15 and 16 present the above dependence for the constant diameter at the root of the notch K .…”
Section: Fracture Tests Of the Notched Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tables 4 and 5 present the results of tests for the specimens with notches in different shapes as well as the averaged values of the four specimens: the maximum displacement u c and critical force F c . Figures 6,7,8,9,10,11,12 and 13 show the dependence of the tensile force F and extensometer displacement u for constant radius r K , while Figs. 14, 15 and 16 present the above dependence for the constant diameter at the root of the notch K .…”
Section: Fracture Tests Of the Notched Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enami [1] studied the influence of initial strain (caused by compression) on the ductile fracture of a material using two types of steel specimens: cylindrical with radius notches with four round notch radii and flat specimens. Barton [8] used cylindrical specimens with four round notch radii made from Ti6Vn4 titanium alloy to describe the process of ductile fracture depending on the rate of strain. Bao [9] used three types of specimens for analysis of ductile fracture in conditions of triaxial state of stress caused by tension: cylindrical specimens with notches (two round notch radii), flat ones and flat-grooved ones, made from EN-AW 2024 T351 aluminum alloy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All quasi-static fracture tests were conducted on a computer controlled servo-hydraulic Dartec universal testing machine whereas a dynamic tensile testing machine known as the "flying wedge" (Barton, 2004) was used for all tests at elevated strain rates. This machine is capable of imparting simultaneous symmetrical loading at both ends of a tensile specimen over a wide range of loading speeds.…”
Section: Testing Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facilities exist both to heat and cool the specimen before testing. Thus the flying wedge is capable of testing specimens over a wide range of strain rates (10 2 − 10 4 s −1 ) and temperatures (−196 − 600 o C) (Barton, 2004).…”
Section: Testing Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application field of CDM theory is very extensive: the theory has been used to describe fatigue [25], creep [27], biomechanical problems [28], brittle or ductile fracture [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] or fracture related to impact [36] problems. In this paper, we focus on ductile damage for which there are a lot of damage models (a more detailed bibliographical study of macroscopic ductile damage models can be found in Jeunechamps [37]): let us cite for example Lemaitre's model [21,[38][39][40][41], Goldthorpe's model [42][43][44], Geers' model [45-50], Cochran and Banner's model [51-53], Bonora's model [54, 55], Johnson-Cook's model [56-58] modified by Borvik and Langseth [36, 59-62] and Longere's [63, 64], Omerspahic's [65] and Zhu's [66] anisotropic models.In such a context, the choice of a generic damage formulation is by no means trivial. From a theoretical point of view, following Besson [1], it is clear that phenomenological models do not represent plastic volume variation and consequently void growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%