1991
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.44.r1258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of theNNπ coupling constants inNNpartial-wave analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
59
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
9
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in our partial-wave analysis of the pp scattering data [22], we found for the ppπ 0 coupling constant f 2 p = 0.0749(7). This value was later confirmed in a combined partial-wave analysis of all pp and np scattering data, assuming charge independence for the pion-nucleon coupling constants [9,11]. There the value f 2 π = 0.075 is recommended for the pion-nucleon coupling constant at the pion pole.…”
Section: B Nijmegen Potentialmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in our partial-wave analysis of the pp scattering data [22], we found for the ppπ 0 coupling constant f 2 p = 0.0749(7). This value was later confirmed in a combined partial-wave analysis of all pp and np scattering data, assuming charge independence for the pion-nucleon coupling constants [9,11]. There the value f 2 π = 0.075 is recommended for the pion-nucleon coupling constant at the pion pole.…”
Section: B Nijmegen Potentialmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Because our analysis of the np data (and hence our careful scrutiny of the np data) has only recently been finished [1], we originally constructed an update (Nijm92pp) of the Nijm78 potential for the pp data only. This pp potential was used in our earlier preliminary np analyses [9,10,11] to parametrize the isovector partial waves. It has χ 2 /N pp = 1.4, which is not as good as the Nijmegen PWA93.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19,20] and references therein), we do not yet envisage, at least not in the near future, the realization of conditions that would allow one to establish, on QCD grounds, the correctness of the about 8000 currently available published pp and np scattering data below pion production threshold. Instead, already in the early 90's the phenomenological analysis carried out by the Nijmegen group made it possible to pin down the pion masses with a precision of 1 MeV from their PWA of pp and np data [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of OPEP has been highlighted by the Nijmegen group [5], whose phase-shift analysis of nucleon-nucleon scattering data included an explicit OPEP tail for separations r ≥ 1.4 fm and a phenomenological treatment of the shorterrange interaction. Their study concluded that the NN data require the exchanges of a charged pion with mass m π + c 2 = 139.4(10) MeV, and a neutral pion with mass m π 0 c 2 = 135.6(13) MeV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An urgent need of the field is an assessment of what (if any) longrange TPEP components are required by the NN data, rather than merely reflecting theoretical prejudice. Several recent developments suggest that such a study may be tractable [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%