2020
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.15460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the main naphthoquinones in Onosma hookeri Clarke. var. longiforum Duthie and its optimization of the ultrasound‐assisted extraction using response surface methodology

Abstract: In this study, besides isovaleryl shikonin, another shikonin derivative, tigloylshikonin, was also isolated from the roots of Onosma hookeri Clarke. var. longiforum Duthie as a main naphthoquinone constituent for the first time. Then optimization of the ultrasonic‐assisted extraction was done by Box–Behnken design–response surface methodology on the basis of single‐factor experiments. The optimized conditions were 72% (v/v) ethanol and the material to solution ratio was 1:37(g/mL) at 52 °C for 77 min. Under th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the O. papillosa showed lower IC 50 or EC 50 values for phosphomolybdenum (1.90 ± 0.07 mg/mL) when compared to O. lycaonica (2.05 ± 0.07 mg/mL), which could be related to their phytochemical contents as O. lycaonica had higher phenolic contents, with (43.5 ± 1.5 mg (gallic acid equivalent)/g extracts), whereas O. papillosa was higher in flavonoids (32.9 ± 0.3 mg (quercetin equivalent)/g extracts) [48]. The aerial part ethanol extracts of O. hookeri showed the same 2,2diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (77.77 ± 1.44 µg/mL) scavenging activity as butylated hydroxy toluene (72.70 ± 1.04 µg/mL), but slightly weaker 2,2 -azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6sulphonic acid (553.56 ± 2.78 µg/mL) scavenging activity and total antioxidant capacity than that of BHT (51.44 ± 1.37 µg/mL), while the ethyl acetate fraction of O. hookeri showed better ABTS scavenger, with IC 50 value of 84.83 ± 1.37 µg/mL [66] [81]. The aerial part extract of O. isauricum exhibited significant antioxidant actions with superiority of its methanol extracts in DPPH (34.75 mg/mL) and CUPRAC (0.643 mg/mL), ferric reducing powers (0.211 mg/mL), ABTS (188.68 mgTE/g extract), superoxide radical scavenging ability (97.50 mgTE/g extract), and total antioxidant ability (86.02 mgAAE/g extract) than that (31.44 mg/mL, 0.471 mg/mL, 0.237 mg/mL, 130.91 mgTE/g, 159.92 mgTE/g, 55.36 mgAAE/g) and (4.69 mg/mL, 0.078 mg/mL, 0.021 mg/mL, 131.94 mgTE/g, 103.23 mgTE/g, 31.17 mgAAE/g extract) for water and ethyl extracts, respectively [83].…”
Section: Antioxidant Activitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, the O. papillosa showed lower IC 50 or EC 50 values for phosphomolybdenum (1.90 ± 0.07 mg/mL) when compared to O. lycaonica (2.05 ± 0.07 mg/mL), which could be related to their phytochemical contents as O. lycaonica had higher phenolic contents, with (43.5 ± 1.5 mg (gallic acid equivalent)/g extracts), whereas O. papillosa was higher in flavonoids (32.9 ± 0.3 mg (quercetin equivalent)/g extracts) [48]. The aerial part ethanol extracts of O. hookeri showed the same 2,2diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (77.77 ± 1.44 µg/mL) scavenging activity as butylated hydroxy toluene (72.70 ± 1.04 µg/mL), but slightly weaker 2,2 -azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6sulphonic acid (553.56 ± 2.78 µg/mL) scavenging activity and total antioxidant capacity than that of BHT (51.44 ± 1.37 µg/mL), while the ethyl acetate fraction of O. hookeri showed better ABTS scavenger, with IC 50 value of 84.83 ± 1.37 µg/mL [66] [81]. The aerial part extract of O. isauricum exhibited significant antioxidant actions with superiority of its methanol extracts in DPPH (34.75 mg/mL) and CUPRAC (0.643 mg/mL), ferric reducing powers (0.211 mg/mL), ABTS (188.68 mgTE/g extract), superoxide radical scavenging ability (97.50 mgTE/g extract), and total antioxidant ability (86.02 mgAAE/g extract) than that (31.44 mg/mL, 0.471 mg/mL, 0.237 mg/mL, 130.91 mgTE/g, 159.92 mgTE/g, 55.36 mgAAE/g) and (4.69 mg/mL, 0.078 mg/mL, 0.021 mg/mL, 131.94 mgTE/g, 103.23 mgTE/g, 31.17 mgAAE/g extract) for water and ethyl extracts, respectively [83].…”
Section: Antioxidant Activitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The antioxidant activity of PSE and PSME was assessed by using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay based on the method previously described (Wu et al, 2020), with a few modifications. Briefly, the 20 µl of PSE or PSME at assigned concentrations were mixed with 180 µl of 0.2 mM DPPH reagent in 96-well plate.…”
Section: Determination Of Antioxidant Activity By Dpph Radical Scavenging Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antioxidant activity of PSE and PSME was also evaluated using the 2,2 0 -azinobis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging assay, according to the previous method (Wu et al, 2020) with slight modification. Ten microliters of PSE or PSME at assigned concentrations were mixed with 990 µl of working ABTS solution.…”
Section: Determination Of Antioxidant Activity By Abts Radical Scavenging Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…longiforum Duthie ( OHC ‐LD) have been carried out in our group. In our previous research, its main lipophilic components, naphthoquinone compositions with antioxidant activities, were investigated 11,12 . However, the hydrophilic components from OHC ‐LD have not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous research, its main lipophilic components, naphthoquinone compositions with antioxidant activities, were investigated. 11,12 However, the hydrophilic components from OHC-LD have not been reported. Meanwhile, in 2015, the polysaccharide from A. euchroma (Royle) Johnst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%