2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.05.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the normal spring stiffness coefficient in the linear spring–dashpot contact model of discrete element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To correctly capture this behaviour, Cummins et al [34] describe how to modify the contact duration calculation by using the dashpot coefficient as described by equation (A.8). For further discussion on the contact forces, additional contact laws, and specific DEM-related topics such as contact duration, etc., see [21,34,35,50,51].…”
Section: Abbreviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To correctly capture this behaviour, Cummins et al [34] describe how to modify the contact duration calculation by using the dashpot coefficient as described by equation (A.8). For further discussion on the contact forces, additional contact laws, and specific DEM-related topics such as contact duration, etc., see [21,34,35,50,51].…”
Section: Abbreviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle-particle and particle-wall collisional forces are handled through a soft-sphere spring-damper collision model, similar to the one originally proposed by Cundall and Strack (1979). In this work, the normal component of the model used by Navarro and De Souza Braun (2013) has been used. The collision force from the j th particle on the i th particle is composed of a conservative spring force (F S c;ij ) and dissipative damping force (F D c;ij ) by…”
Section: Lagrangian Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Þn ij is the normal relative contact velocity and h is the normal damping coefficient. Navarro and De Souza Braun (2013) rigorously derived the damping coefficient and the time in collision (t c ) as…”
Section: Lagrangian Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods for determining the value of this parameter have been proposed, most of which equate some aspect of the contact to a Hertzian contact. For example, the anticipated maximum contact overlap, the anticipated maximum elastic strain energy or the binary collision duration have all been used to determine the linear spring stiffness. In the current work, klinear is chosen such that the overlap caused by the weight of N particles resting on top of the bottom particle is equal to the overlap that would occur if the linear spring was replaced by a Hertzian spring, assuming a circular contact area (Eq.…”
Section: Simulation Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%