2008
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m709825200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Number of Active GroES Subunits in the Fused Heptamer GroES Required for Interactions with GroEL

Abstract: A double-heptamer ring chaperonin GroEL binds denatured substrate protein, ATP, and GroES to the same heptamer ring and encapsulates substrate into the central cavity underneath GroES where productive folding occurs. GroES is a disk-shaped heptamer, and each subunit has a GroEL-binding loop. The residues of the GroEL subunit responsible for GroES binding largely overlap those involved in substrate binding, and the mechanism by which GroES can replace the substrate when GroES binds to GroEL/substrate complex re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To demonstrate this hypothesis, the N265A mutant of GroEL (a substrate trap mutant) was added to the reaction mixture. The substrate trap mutant has been shown to bind a denatured protein more strongly than wild-type GroEL even in the presence of ATP, although it does not bind GroES (27,28). When an excess amount of the substrate trap mutant was present in the refolding mixture of SR1⌬C/ES/GFP, the yield of GFP folding was markedly decreased (Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of C-terminal Truncation On Gfp Encapsulation Withinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate this hypothesis, the N265A mutant of GroEL (a substrate trap mutant) was added to the reaction mixture. The substrate trap mutant has been shown to bind a denatured protein more strongly than wild-type GroEL even in the presence of ATP, although it does not bind GroES (27,28). When an excess amount of the substrate trap mutant was present in the refolding mixture of SR1⌬C/ES/GFP, the yield of GFP folding was markedly decreased (Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of C-terminal Truncation On Gfp Encapsulation Withinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutant proteins were generated by site-directed mutagenesis using the Prime-STAR mutagenesis basal kit from Takara. GroEL mutants and GroES were purified as described previously (25,26). GroEL with mutations A384C/S509C/C138A/C458A/C519A (27) (termed GroEL(2Cys)) was stored in HKM buffer (25 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl 2 , and 100 mM KCl) containing 5 mM dithiothreitol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The region of substrate and GroES binding at the apical domain of GroEL largely overlaps, but the mechanism by which GroES competes with the substrate in the GroEL-substrate complex is still unclear. Recent studies suggest the existence of an intermediate GroEL-substrate-GroES complex in which the substrate and GroES bind to GroEL by sharing seven common binding sites [83].…”
Section: Chaperone Activity In the Bacterial Cytosolmentioning
confidence: 99%