2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.94.034027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the QCD coupling from ALEPHτdecay data

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

22
320
6
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(353 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
22
320
6
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In these figures we have taken Q 2 = −M 2 τ and the strong coupling constant is taken from direct measurements at the Z peak, α s (M 2 Z ) = 0.1197 ± 0.0028 [1]. This is evolved using a four-loop β function using the package [46,47] to the τ mass scale which yields α s (M 2 τ ) = 0.3298 ± 0.0118, and is in excellent agreement with the latest determination from τ -decay in [48]. The figures clearly show that the renormalization group improved series based on the optimal renormalization group has substantially less scale dependence than the unsummed series.…”
Section: Closed Form Sum Of Rg-accessible Logarithmssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In these figures we have taken Q 2 = −M 2 τ and the strong coupling constant is taken from direct measurements at the Z peak, α s (M 2 Z ) = 0.1197 ± 0.0028 [1]. This is evolved using a four-loop β function using the package [46,47] to the τ mass scale which yields α s (M 2 τ ) = 0.3298 ± 0.0118, and is in excellent agreement with the latest determination from τ -decay in [48]. The figures clearly show that the renormalization group improved series based on the optimal renormalization group has substantially less scale dependence than the unsummed series.…”
Section: Closed Form Sum Of Rg-accessible Logarithmssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The actual uncertainties are much larger than the very naive fit errors shown in the table, since they totally ignore the strong instabilities appearing as soon as one moves from the selected pointŝ 0 = 1.55 GeV to increase by a factor of three the error quoted in Table 2. 1 As the fit quality improves with growing values of λ V , the fitted central values of α s (m 2 τ ) approach also the much more solid determinations quoted in Table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…1 with a very comprehensive analysis of the most recent experimental data. The τ decay width is very sensitive to α s and provides a rigorous determination of the QCD coupling at the τ mass scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the result of this the error on the α s quoted in the most recent Particle Data Group (PDG) Review update has increased for the first time in many years: α s (M Z ) = 0.1181 (16) [5]. This should be compared to the 2013 PDG value, α s (M Z ) = 0.1185 (6). Lattice QCD offers the possibility to determine the strong coupling constant at relatively low energy scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far the only non-lattice method that offers a low energy determination of α s is the analysis of the τ decay but there are large systematic uncertainties due to different ways of organizing the perturbative expansion in this method (see Ref. [6] for a recent work on this topic and references therein). For certain applications it is important to have the running of the coupling constant at low energy scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%