2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018ja025759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Refractive Contribution to GPS Phase “Scintillation”

Abstract: As L‐band radio waves travel through the ionosphere, such as those transmitted by the Global Positioning System (GPS) satellites, changes in the electron density along the ray path may induce refractive and/or diffractive variations in the signal's phase; where refractive variations are deterministic and diffractive variations are stochastic. Typically, the refractive component of these variations is thought to be slow varying, associated with frequencies less than 0.1 Hz. Therefore, if the refractive contribu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
108
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
108
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The phase deviation caused by an oscillator anomaly is proportional to the carrier frequency, while ionospheric scintillation is the result of combined refractive and diffractive effects as the signal propagates through ionospheric plasma irregularities (Carrano et al., 2013). The magnitude of the ionospheric‐phase scintillation is approximately inversely proportional to the carrier frequency for weak and moderate scintillation events (diffractive contribution dominates in strong scintillation and thus breaks the inverse proportion relationship) (McCaffrey & Jayachandran, 2019). These different characteristics of phase disturbances at different carrier frequencies can be utilized as features to distinguish the two types of events.…”
Section: Satellite Oscillator Anomaly Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phase deviation caused by an oscillator anomaly is proportional to the carrier frequency, while ionospheric scintillation is the result of combined refractive and diffractive effects as the signal propagates through ionospheric plasma irregularities (Carrano et al., 2013). The magnitude of the ionospheric‐phase scintillation is approximately inversely proportional to the carrier frequency for weak and moderate scintillation events (diffractive contribution dominates in strong scintillation and thus breaks the inverse proportion relationship) (McCaffrey & Jayachandran, 2019). These different characteristics of phase disturbances at different carrier frequencies can be utilized as features to distinguish the two types of events.…”
Section: Satellite Oscillator Anomaly Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ionospheric scintillation is typically due to a combination of refraction and scattering or diffraction of the signal propagating through plasma structures. The diffractive contribution introduces additional disturbance and cannot be removed by the dual‐frequency measurements or ionospheric models (Carrano, Groves, McNeil, & Doherty, 2013; McCaffrey & Jayachandran, 2019; Morton et al., 2020). Therefore, this approach will not be effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the amplitude scintillation is caused only by the diffractive effect, while the phase scintillation can be caused by both refractive and diffractive effects (De Franceschi et al, 2019;McCaffrey & Jayachandran, 2019;Wang et al, 2018). These indices were calculated by detrending the raw (50 Hz) data with a cutoff frequency of 0.2 Hz.…”
Section: Bzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al (2018) showed that rapid variations in the phase of a trans-ionospheric signal can arise as a result of plasma structures moving rapidly relative to an observer at ground level and can therefore give the appearance of phase scintillation. Rapid changes in the spatial distribution of electron density can also introduce similar effects, as the GNSS satellite-toreceiver ray path can sweep through these irregularities at high speed, resulting in high-frequency refractive variations (McCaffrey and Jayachandran, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%