1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2264(199802)21:2<101::aid-gcc4>3.0.co;2-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the replication error phenotype in human tumors without the requirement for matching normal DNA by analysis of mononucleotide repeat microsatellites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
161
1
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
161
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported a high accuracy of specific MSI markers in detecting the MSI-H phenotype, especially for the highly monomorphic mononucleotide marker BAT26. 28 We compared the sensitivity and specificity of each individual marker of the Bethesda panel for its ability to define the MSI-H (n = 45) phenotype based on all 5 markers. All 45 MSI-H tumors (from CALGB and UCSD) were included in this analysis.…”
Section: Msi Status Correlation With Hmlh1 Promoter Methylation and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported a high accuracy of specific MSI markers in detecting the MSI-H phenotype, especially for the highly monomorphic mononucleotide marker BAT26. 28 We compared the sensitivity and specificity of each individual marker of the Bethesda panel for its ability to define the MSI-H (n = 45) phenotype based on all 5 markers. All 45 MSI-H tumors (from CALGB and UCSD) were included in this analysis.…”
Section: Msi Status Correlation With Hmlh1 Promoter Methylation and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MSI status of the 100 tumours in the first series were analysed by the two mononucleotide repeats, BAT-25 and BAT-26, which are robust markers for MSI-H detection (Loukola et al, 2001;Zhou et al, 1998). Tumours with mutation in both markers were defined MSI-H (10 cases) and the rest were put in the MSS/MSI-L group.…”
Section: Msi Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the samples were tested at ®ve microsatellite loci including the highly unstable BAT-26 locus, claimed to be su cient alone for identifying the RER status (Zhou et al, 1998;Hoang et al, 1997). The other 4 loci included L-myc, TGFbRII, D13S160, and D2S123 using the primers and conditions described elsewhere (Young et al, 1995;Huang et al, 1996).…”
Section: Rer Status Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%