1995
DOI: 10.1002/sia.740230605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the surface coverage of Mo/Al2O3 catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 -19 In combination with chemisorption techniques, ISS even has been employed to determine surface coverages quantitatively. 10,16,20 The method is based on quantitative use of the Al/O ISS intensity ratios, which decrease with increasing transition-metal oxide content. On the basis of such measurements it has been argued that the support is only covered to ¾85% (55%) in WO 3 /TiO 2 WO 3 /ZrO 2 catalysts with tungsten contents above the theoretical monolayer surface coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 -19 In combination with chemisorption techniques, ISS even has been employed to determine surface coverages quantitatively. 10,16,20 The method is based on quantitative use of the Al/O ISS intensity ratios, which decrease with increasing transition-metal oxide content. On the basis of such measurements it has been argued that the support is only covered to ¾85% (55%) in WO 3 /TiO 2 WO 3 /ZrO 2 catalysts with tungsten contents above the theoretical monolayer surface coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed correspondence can be considered as remarkable, due to the major differences in the nature of methods involved. carried out after different heat pretreatments and at low gas pressure [2,3]. Moreover, taking into account the limitations of the EM method, e.g., assumption of the same IEP for the W supported species and for bulk WO3, possible losses of W supported species to the solution, and the reported limitations of the ISS and CO methods [2,3], the agreement among the different sets of data can be considered as very good.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently ion scattering spectroscopy (ISS) and low temperature CO adsorption have been ,used successfully to determine absolute surface coverages (0iss and 0co ) in molybdenum-alumina [2] and tungsten-alumina [3] catalysts. For the W-alumina catalysts, the 0co values were very similar to those obtained with the ISS method, for a particular loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the coverage values obtained from ISS are in reasonable agreement with those estimated from the CO adsorption method. This suggests that the proposed methodology for coverage measurements, which has proven e †ective for alumina-supported Mo, Re and W catalysts, 11,17,18 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This approach has proven e †ective for alumina-supported molybdenum (Mo), rhenium (Re) and tungsten (W) catalysts. 11,17,18 The present work is a part of a systematic study aimed at evaluating the potential use of the proposed methodology when other supports are used. The study will be restricted to the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%