2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the within and between flock prevalence and identification of risk factors for Salmonella infections in laying hen flocks housed in conventional and alternative systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have indicated that moist environments promote the multiplication of microflora (Rusin et al, 1998), and bacterial abundance on wet litter was found to more diverse than that in dry conditions (Dumas et al, 2011). Furthermore, the absence of dry cleaning between laying rounds reportedly worsens the Salmonella contamination status in conventional battery cages (Van Hoorebeke et al, 2010). We also detected contamination in air samples.…”
Section: Eric-pcr Fingerprinting and Clustering Analysissupporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have indicated that moist environments promote the multiplication of microflora (Rusin et al, 1998), and bacterial abundance on wet litter was found to more diverse than that in dry conditions (Dumas et al, 2011). Furthermore, the absence of dry cleaning between laying rounds reportedly worsens the Salmonella contamination status in conventional battery cages (Van Hoorebeke et al, 2010). We also detected contamination in air samples.…”
Section: Eric-pcr Fingerprinting and Clustering Analysissupporting
confidence: 48%
“…In the present study, Salmonella-positive samples were obtained from both the henhouse and egg collection area on both contaminated farms. These contaminations may not have been newly introduced, but the effects of reinvasions of the pathogen that might have been present in the farm environment long before the investigation (Van Hoorebeke et al, 2010). The contaminated status may persist over successive laying periods (Dewaele et al, 2012b), which poses a potential threat to the farm's entire flocks and eggs, especially during the molting period when the layers' resistance against disease tends to be lower, as contaminated hens are more likely to disseminate pathogens into the environment (Golden et al, 2008).…”
Section: Eric-pcr Fingerprinting and Clustering Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broilers raised on litter had lower caecal Salmonella populations than the caged birds and it is speculated that this could have been due to the fact that litter intake may have modulated the intestinal microflora by increasing competitive exclusion microorganisms, which discouraged Salmonella colonization. A European multinational study also indicated lower Salmonella levels in floorraised layers compared with caged layers (Van Hoorebeke et al, 2010). These findings have been used as an excuse for not removing manure or cleaning and disinfecting between batches of broilers.…”
Section: Nutritional Salmonella Control Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Van Hoorebeke et al [31] found significantly higher Salmonella infections in flocks in housing systems in winter compared to the other seasons of the year, due to the fact that in winter hens are kept inside because of wet and cold weather conditions, causing low air quality [32,33] and high density of animals, which are well-known risk factors for the spread of Salmonella on farms [34,35]. Despite the fact that hens of organic and free-range systems are outdoors and sanitization of the "floor" is impossible, eggs from these types of farms are of high quality.…”
Section: Comparison Among Brands and Farming Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%