2000
DOI: 10.1134/1.1342446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Young’s modulus and hysteresis by the indentation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The indentation load‐displacement response of developed polymer composites was obtained using an instrumented hardness tester with a Vickers diamond indenter with a load of 0.3 N. For S6 (HDPE‐40 vol % HAp), Vickers hardness was measured in a Vickers microindenter using a load of 0.4 N. It can be recalled that, Bulychev et al30 was first to use the load‐displacement sensing indentation testing in the early 1970's, as an experiment tool for measuring hardness and elastic modulus. In case of polymer‐based materials, the instrumented hardness measurement technique is considered as a useful technique to examine the extent to which the load‐displacement behavior is influenced by viscoelastic deformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indentation load‐displacement response of developed polymer composites was obtained using an instrumented hardness tester with a Vickers diamond indenter with a load of 0.3 N. For S6 (HDPE‐40 vol % HAp), Vickers hardness was measured in a Vickers microindenter using a load of 0.4 N. It can be recalled that, Bulychev et al30 was first to use the load‐displacement sensing indentation testing in the early 1970's, as an experiment tool for measuring hardness and elastic modulus. In case of polymer‐based materials, the instrumented hardness measurement technique is considered as a useful technique to examine the extent to which the load‐displacement behavior is influenced by viscoelastic deformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On each sample 2 series of statistical nanoindentation tests were carried out that differ in the loading protocol: the first series assesses the microstructure from indentation hardness and indentation stiffness results; obtained by a trapezoidal load history with a maximum load of P max ϭ 2 mN, applied in 10 s, kept constant over 5 s and unloaded in 10 s. Following fast loading, the 5-s dwelling time is short enough to ensure that the indentation hardness, H ϭ P max /A c (with A c the projected area of contact between the indenter probe and the indented surface), is representative of the strength content (19,23,24). In turn, the unloading is fast enough so that the indentation modulus M, determined from the unloading slope S ϭ (dP/ dh) hϭh max at the end of the holding phase truly relates to the elasticity content of the indented material (25), namely the indentation modulus M ϭ E/(1 Ϫ 2 ) ϭ S/(2a U ), with E the Young's modulus, the Poisson's ratio, and a U ϭ ͌ A c / the radius of contact between the indenter probe and the indented surface upon unloading (21,22,26). The load protocol of the second series differs from the first in a 180-s long dwelling period, which allows the assessment of the contact creep compliance rate, L (t) Х 2a U ḣh/P max , and the creep compliance, L(t) ϭ 2a U ⌬h(t)/P max ϩ const, from the time-dependent indentation depth rate ḣ(t) and the change in indentation depth ⌬h(t) ϭ h(t) Ϫ h 0 in excess of the indentation depth h 0 Ϸ 200 nm Ϯ 45 nm recorded during the 10-s loading to P max ϭ 2 mN (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of a method of determination of Young's modulus according to the indentation diagram was a very important step in interpretation of indentation tests. The method was introduced by Bulychev, Alekhin, Shorshorov and co-workers in 1975 (see Bulychev et al . 1975Bulychev et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%