Determination of the Zeta Potential of Porous Substrates by Droplet Deflection. I. The Influence of Ionic Strength and pH Value of an Aqueous Electrolyte in Contact with a Borosilicate Surface

Abstract

This paper presents a new method to determine the zeta potential of porous substrates in contact with a liquid. Electroosmosis, arising near the solid/liquid boundaries within a fully saturated porous substrate, pumps against the capillary pressure arising from the surface tension of a droplet placed in series with the pump. The method is based on measuring the liquid/gas interface deflection due to the imposed electric potential difference. The distinguishing features of our technique are accuracy, speed, and reliability, accomplished with a straightforward and cost-effective setup. In this particular setup, a bistable configuration of two opposing droplets is used. The energy barrier between the stable states defines the range of capillary resistance and can be tuned by the total droplet volume. The electroosmotic pump is placed between the droplets. The large surface area-to-volume ratio of the porous substrate enables the pumping strength to exceed the capillary resistance even for droplets small enough that their shapes are negligibly influenced by gravity. Using a relatively simple model for the flow within the porous substrate, the zeta potential resulting from the substrate-liquid combination is determined. Extensive measurements of a borosilicate substrate in contact with different aqueous electrolytes are made. The results of the measurements clarify the influence of the ionic strength and pH value on the zeta potential and yield an empirical relationship important to engineering approaches.

A simple method to determine the surface charge in microfluidic channels

“…By comparing last two columns we observe differences in s and s PB of about 10% or less: s PB 5 À1871, À2071, and À1971 mC/m 2 for channel 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The corresponding zeta potential values are in good agreement with those found in literature [17,4].…”

Nonlinear oscillatory dynamics of the hardening of calcium phosphate bone cements

“…Oscillations of ionic fluxes and electrical potential in Martin’s oscillator 61 - involving a hypodermic syringe filled with a physiological solution, having a plunger removed and being immersed vertically in pure water – cannot be due to interfacial tension or diffusion potential, and are thought to be due to periodic changes in charge separation in the electrical double layer caused by the mobility of its diffusive outer portion 62 . However, this explanation was derived for glass capillaries, a material that is relatively smooth compared to the uneven surface of CP grains and that carries a significantly higher surface charge than CP under physiological conditions: ζ < −20 mV 63,64 vs. −10 < ζ < 10 mV 65 , respectively. Finally, profiles of the liquid order, including hydrogen bond and dipole ordering, forming in response to the electronic and geometric features of the solid surface, are typified by fluctuations at very short, pico- and femto-second timescales.…”

Microfluidic flow driven by electric fields

“…By comparing last two columns we observe differences in σ and σ P B of about 10 % or less: σ P B = −18 ± 1, −20 ± 1, and −19 ± 1 mC/m 2 for channel 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The corresponding zeta potential values are in good agreement with those found in literature [89,3].…”