2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of three-dimensional solubility parameters of styrene butadiene rubber and the potential application in tire tread formula design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interactions between SWCNTs and NBR/PAE were explored using the Hansen solubility parameter method (HSP) method. The polymer swelling behavior and polymer–solvent and polymer–polymer interactions can be predicted using the HSP method [ 39 , 40 ]. Herein, the energy difference ( Ra ), defined as the spatial distance between polymer and solvent and calculated by Equation (2), was introduced.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interactions between SWCNTs and NBR/PAE were explored using the Hansen solubility parameter method (HSP) method. The polymer swelling behavior and polymer–solvent and polymer–polymer interactions can be predicted using the HSP method [ 39 , 40 ]. Herein, the energy difference ( Ra ), defined as the spatial distance between polymer and solvent and calculated by Equation (2), was introduced.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.09–4.51 MPa 1/2 and 11.7%–44.1%, respectively (Table S5, Supporting Information). This indicates that the γ and δ values determined experimentally have large uncertainty. , Commonly, the δ t , δ d , δ p , and δ h data for a solid are separately determined using a “solvent spectrum” method. ,,,,, The consistency between the Hildebrand parameter (δ t ) values and the Hansen component (δ d , δ p , and δ h ) values was examined based on eq . Figure a shows the plot of δ t 2 versus ∑δ i 2 (where i = d, p, and h) for 23 solids with δ data available from the literature (Tables S1 and S3, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we know, unlike most (volatile) liquids, the γ and δ parameters of solids cannot be directly measured and many indirect methods were thus used to estimate their values. , The γ parameters of solids are commonly estimated using contact angle ,,, and inverse gas chromatography (IGC) methods. For the contact angle method, the contact angles of at least two probe liquids with known γ parameter values on a solid surface are first measured and the γ parameter values of the solid are then estimated based on theoretical models such as Young’s equation, Owens–Wendt equation, Neumann’s equation of state, and Wu’s equation. ,,,, The IGC method is essentially based on the measurement of adsorption–desorption behavior of probe liquids (commonly alkanes) on a solid to estimate the γ (commonly γ d ) value of the solid. The δ parameters of solids are commonly estimated by determination of some quantities relating to the solid–liquid affinity, such as solubility, swelling, and dispersion of solids in various liquids with different δ (a “solvent spectrum”). ,,,,, The δ parameters of liquids that exhibit the maximum affinity with a solid are considered to be those of the solid. Overall, the determination of the characteristic (γ and δ) parameters of solids is difficult and/or time-consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The DATA FIT approaches 1 when all the good solvents are included within the solubility sphere and all the bad ones are outside. 19 Up to now, the HSP values of the hydrogenated nitrile rubber (HNBR), 21 nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), 22 fluorine rubber (FKM), fluorosilicone rubber (FVMQ), 23 natural rubber (NR), 24 and acrylate rubber (ACM) 25 have been well determined, and the predictive power of the HSP values in swelling properties of rubber-solvent systems has been well proven. However, the determination of HSP values for rubber blends has not been involved, although sometimes the calculation of HSP values for the solvent mixtures has been carried out.…”
Section: Data Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%