1980
DOI: 10.1021/ac50064a031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of total biogenic sulfur gases by filter/flash vaporization/flame photometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These considerations narrowed the focus of our development efforts to sorbents and filters. Sulfur dioxide is relatively easy to collect and has been sampled successfully at stack concentrations using uncoated molecular sieves (MS) (3) and at ambient concentrations using various impregnated filters (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). The reported aqueous impregnating solutions usually contained the hydroxide, bicarbonate, or carbonate salts of sodium or potassium, along with glycerin or triethanolamine (TEA) as an humectant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These considerations narrowed the focus of our development efforts to sorbents and filters. Sulfur dioxide is relatively easy to collect and has been sampled successfully at stack concentrations using uncoated molecular sieves (MS) (3) and at ambient concentrations using various impregnated filters (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). The reported aqueous impregnating solutions usually contained the hydroxide, bicarbonate, or carbonate salts of sodium or potassium, along with glycerin or triethanolamine (TEA) as an humectant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these preceding techniques, other systems have been devised for the collection and subsequent quantitative determination of total gaseous sulfur at low-and sub-part-per-billion (v/v) concentrations (15,16). One such approach developed in our laboratory involved the oxidative conversion of reduced sulfur gases to sulfur dioxide, which was subsequently collected on glass fiber filters (16). The extracts from these filters were then analyzed for sulfur via flash vaporization/flame photometry (FV/FPD) using small platinum boats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Purified sulfur-free air was prepared by passing compressed laboratory air through a multibed solid adsorbent filter cartridge (13). The standard sulfur gas concentrations were prepared by use of the dilution procedures previously described (13,16,25). Standard gas concentrations in the 1 to 20 ppb (v/v) range could be prepared with a precision of approximately ±10% from the gravimetrically calibrated permeation devices whose loss rates ranged from 20 ng of S/min to 200 ng of S/min.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…quartz tube housed inside a Thermolyne tube furnace held at an optimum temperature for the conversion of that particular sulfur compound to SO2. 15 The resultant SO 2 stream was then passed into a Monitor Labs Model 8850 Fluorescent SO2 Analyzer. Data were recorded on a strip chart recorder in a continuous mode since this SO 2 analyzer, when operated at its low range, typically took at least 15 minutes from the introduction of a new concentration to achieve a steady-state response level.…”
Section: Fluorescent So 2 Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%