Determination of total dissolved sulfide in the pH range 7.5 to 11.5 by ion selective electrodes

Guterman, Hugo; Ben‐Yaakov, S.; Abeliovich, Aharon

doi:10.1021/ac00261a021

Cited by 16 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Different sulfide-ISEs were developed in the 1980s and 1990s for sulfur determination in liquid (see e.g. Atta et al, 1998;Guterman et al, 1983;Tóth et al, 1988) and even solid (García-Calzada et al, 1999) samples. However, results on sulfide-ISEs seem to be less accurate than those obtained for sulfate-ISEs due to different inferences on the measuring principle.…”

Section: In-situ Sulfurous Compounds Sensorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anaerobic treatment of sulfate-rich wastewaters: process modeling and control

Steyer¹,

Bernet²,

Lens³

et al. 2020

Environmental Technologies to Treat Sulphur Pollution: Principles and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A variety of anthropogenic activities, especially at industrial level, generate wastewater streams rich in sulfate which, if improperly treated, can cause health, social and environmental problems (Serrano et al., 2020). These industrial activities include food production (e.g. edible oil, seafood-processing), fermentation industry, tanneries, coal-burning power plants, paper and pulp industry, mining and metallurgical processes. Additionally, in some regions (e.g. Hong Kong), the use of seawater for toilet flushing to alleviate the pressure on potable water has increased the sulfate concentration in municipal sewage (Li et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2016). Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a well-established technology to transform municipal and industrial organic-rich wastewaters into renewable energy in the form of methane-rich biogas. Besides energy recovery, AD presents other important advantages compared to aerobic treatment such as low sludge production and low energy requirements (Puyol et al., 2017). AD is also a suitable technology to treat organic-rich municipal and industrial wastewaters containing sulfate. However, a high sulfate content can affect the AD process performance and feasibility due to (i) the competition for easily biodegradable organic matter (e.g. short chain fatty acids, hydrogen) between sulfate reducers and anaerobic microorganisms (Cassidy et al., 2015; Kalyuzhnyi et al., 1998), (ii) the generation of H 2 S, the product of sulfate

show abstract

Section: In-situ Sulfurous Compounds Sensorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anaerobic treatment of sulfate-rich wastewaters: process modeling and control

Steyer¹,

Bernet²,

Lens³

et al. 2020

Environmental Technologies to Treat Sulphur Pollution: Principles and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Microbial groups (1988) developed an appropriate microprocessor interface for the pH ranges of 7.5-11.5 and 9-12, respectively, using a sulphide ISE as sensor. In the work of Guterman, Ben-Yaakov and Abeliovich (1983), the authors were able to measure sulphide in the concentration range of 10 −5 -10 −1 M. To determine the total sulphide concentration for sewage waters in the pH range 3-11.4, an electrochemical method was tested using a potentiometric cell, which contained either a sulphide ISE-glass electrode pair or an Ag/Ag 2 S electrode-glass electrode system (Schmidt, Marton and Hlavay 1994). Both gave good results for the measurement of the TDS, in a sulphide concentration range of 10 −12 -10 −2 M. Villa-Gomez et al (2014) showed that an Ag 2 S pS electrode could be used to continuously monitor online the sulphide concentration in sulphate-reducing bioreactors and can thus be used to develop a strategy for sulphide control (see the section 'Control of biological sulphide production').…”

Section: In Situ Sulphide Sensorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Automated biological sulphate reduction: a review on mathematical models, monitoring and bioprocess control

Cassidy

Lubberding

Esposito

et al. 2015

FEMS Microbiology Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the sulphate-reducing process, bioprocess control can be used to regulate the competition between microbial groups, to optimize the input of the electron donor and/or to maximize or minimize the production of sulphide. As shown in this review, modelling and monitoring are important tools in the development and application of a bioprocess control strategy. Pre-eminent literature on modelling, monitoring and control of sulphate-reducing processes is reviewed. This paper firstly reviews existing mathematical models for sulphate reduction, focusing on models for biofilms, microbial competition, inhibition and bioreactor dynamics. Secondly, a summary of process monitoring strategies is presented. Special attention is given to in situ sensors for sulphate, sulphide and electron donor concentrations as well as for biomass activity and composition. Finally, the state of the art of the bioprocess control strategies in biological sulphate reduction processes is overviewed.

show abstract

“…The sulfide ion selective electrode method has been reported (3,4) to accurately measure sulfide concentrations at 10 ng/mL by using targeted calibration standards; however, the response is notably slow and interfering substances such as cyanide will produce a high bias for low-level determinations.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%