“…These methods are based on a wide range of analytical techniques such as neutron activation analysis (NAA) (Dermelj and Byrne, 1997;Feng et al, 1996), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Woller et al, 1997;Yoshinaga and Morita, 1997), inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) (Campos et al, 1997), microwave-induced plasma atomic emission spectrometry (MIP-AES) (Costa-Fernandez et al, 1995), electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS) (Burrini and Cagnini, 1997;Dobrowolski and Mierzwa, 1996), cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry (CV-AAS) (Aduna de Paz et al, 1997;Bortoli et al, 1995;Doerr and Deinzer, 1997;Kingston and Mclntosh, 1995;Lippo et al, 1997;Matthiessen, 1996;Murphy et al, 1996;Navarro et al, 1992;Ombaba, 1996;Pasquini et al, 1988;Rodriguez et al, 1994;Samanta and Chakraborti, 1997;Saraswati et al, 1995;Schintu et al, 1992;Schnitzer et al, 1995;Tahan et al, 1993Tahan et al, , 1995Tinggi and Craven, 1996;Zhou et al, 1996), and atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) (Brahma et al, 1997;D'Ulivo and Rapsomanikis, 1997). The most wide spread technique for the determination of mercury is CV-AAS because of its high sensitivity, absence of spectral interference, relatively low operation costs, simplicity, and speed .…”