1997
DOI: 10.1039/a606044g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Total Mercury in Sediments by Microwave-assisted Digestion-Flow Injection-Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 It seems that Hg, even at relatively low concentrations, adheres to the walls of the introduction system, causing contamination of subsequent samples. 8 It seems that Hg, even at relatively low concentrations, adheres to the walls of the introduction system, causing contamination of subsequent samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 It seems that Hg, even at relatively low concentrations, adheres to the walls of the introduction system, causing contamination of subsequent samples. 8 It seems that Hg, even at relatively low concentrations, adheres to the walls of the introduction system, causing contamination of subsequent samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 It seems that Hg, even at relatively low concentrations, adheres to the walls of the introduction system, causing contamination of subsequent samples. 11 Another used a combination of flow injection sample introduction and either Triton X-100/ammonia/ ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid 8,12,13 or 2-mercaptoethanol 14 as the carrier solution. There have been attempts to minimize these memory effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are based on a wide range of analytical techniques such as neutron activation analysis (NAA) (Dermelj and Byrne, 1997;Feng et al, 1996), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Woller et al, 1997;Yoshinaga and Morita, 1997), inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) (Campos et al, 1997), microwave-induced plasma atomic emission spectrometry (MIP-AES) (Costa-Fernandez et al, 1995), electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS) (Burrini and Cagnini, 1997;Dobrowolski and Mierzwa, 1996), cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry (CV-AAS) (Aduna de Paz et al, 1997;Bortoli et al, 1995;Doerr and Deinzer, 1997;Kingston and Mclntosh, 1995;Lippo et al, 1997;Matthiessen, 1996;Murphy et al, 1996;Navarro et al, 1992;Ombaba, 1996;Pasquini et al, 1988;Rodriguez et al, 1994;Samanta and Chakraborti, 1997;Saraswati et al, 1995;Schintu et al, 1992;Schnitzer et al, 1995;Tahan et al, 1993Tahan et al, , 1995Tinggi and Craven, 1996;Zhou et al, 1996), and atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) (Brahma et al, 1997;D'Ulivo and Rapsomanikis, 1997). The most wide spread technique for the determination of mercury is CV-AAS because of its high sensitivity, absence of spectral interference, relatively low operation costs, simplicity, and speed .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speciation of mercury varies in different kind of samples which greatly influence method of sample preparation and digestion [2]. The most common methods for digestion of mineral samples (sediment, soil, rocks, ores) include digestion with a mixture of acids promoted by conventional [2][3][4], or microwave heating [2,5]. Some authors insist on the total digestion of geological samples [6], although others have found that for mercury analysis a partial digestion was sufficient [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%