2001
DOI: 10.1007/s002160100729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of trace amounts of lead in mussels by flow-injection flame atomic-absorption spectrometry coupled with on-line minicolumn preconcentration

Abstract: A minicolumn packed with poly(aminophosphonic acid) chelating resin incorporated in an on-line preconcentration system for flame atomic-absorption spectrometry was used to determine ultratrace amounts of lead in mussel samples at microg L(-1) level. The preconcentrated lead was eluted with hydrochloric acid and injected directly into the nebulizer for atomization in an air-acetylene flame for measurement. The performance characteristics of the determination of lead were: preconcentration factor 26.8 for 1 min … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, preconcentration in the batch mode can be time-and reagent-consuming, with a risk of sample contamination or analyte loss, whereas automated techniques such as flow-injection (FI) are rapid, economical, and may require only small volumes [6,7]. FI sample introduction has been coupled with FAAS for preconcentration and matrix removal [8], and several solid-phase extraction (SPE) procedures have been developed for the determination of lead [9][10][11][12][13]. The most commonly used procedure involves lead complexation with DDC, followed by retention on C-18 silica and Amberlite XAD-7 [5,12,13], though various other extractants, including silica treated with Aliquat 336 [4], alumina [14], cellulose [15], and Chromosorb 102 [16], have been used to retain the uncomplexed cation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, preconcentration in the batch mode can be time-and reagent-consuming, with a risk of sample contamination or analyte loss, whereas automated techniques such as flow-injection (FI) are rapid, economical, and may require only small volumes [6,7]. FI sample introduction has been coupled with FAAS for preconcentration and matrix removal [8], and several solid-phase extraction (SPE) procedures have been developed for the determination of lead [9][10][11][12][13]. The most commonly used procedure involves lead complexation with DDC, followed by retention on C-18 silica and Amberlite XAD-7 [5,12,13], though various other extractants, including silica treated with Aliquat 336 [4], alumina [14], cellulose [15], and Chromosorb 102 [16], have been used to retain the uncomplexed cation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Conversion of the analyte to the liquid phase is possible by wet acid extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, or acid or alkaline ultrasound-assisted extraction. [6][7][8] Flow injection (FI) digestion procedures involving microwave energy present some advantages over their manual counterparts, such as smaller digestion times, easy digestion of complex matrices and the use of a closed vessel (decreasing the losses of volatile analytes and increasing personal safety). Due to these advantages, microwaves have been used on-line in different studies for the determination of trace metals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%