1971
DOI: 10.1021/ac60297a025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of trace quantities of aluminum and chromium in uranium by gas phase chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chelation of chromium occurs over a broad pH range (5) using a very large excess of chelating agent (6), whereas quantitative aluminum chelate formation requires a pH of about 5.5 (1,7). The chromium chelate is also quantitatively formed at 150-175 °C using a dilute hexane solution of the chelating agent (8), but in this work it was discovered that the aluminum chelate is destroyed at temperatures above 100 °C, with or without a buffer, and at 60-70 °C hexane and cyclohexane are inefficient in the extraction of the chelates, being about 10% low for both metals for a single extraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The chelation of chromium occurs over a broad pH range (5) using a very large excess of chelating agent (6), whereas quantitative aluminum chelate formation requires a pH of about 5.5 (1,7). The chromium chelate is also quantitatively formed at 150-175 °C using a dilute hexane solution of the chelating agent (8), but in this work it was discovered that the aluminum chelate is destroyed at temperatures above 100 °C, with or without a buffer, and at 60-70 °C hexane and cyclohexane are inefficient in the extraction of the chelates, being about 10% low for both metals for a single extraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buffering the system and using benzene as the extracting medium solves most of these problems. However, in attempting to use the buffer system reported by Genty et al (1), it was soon realized that chromium was not being completely extracted with one extraction at elevated temperatures, and that the components of the buffer system, which would seriously impair the sensitivity of the detector, were relatively slow in being washed from the sample prior to injection. Use of a less concentrated buffer system, and the use of sodium acetate in place of ammonium acetate solved both of these problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations