1986
DOI: 10.1093/jat/10.6.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Trazodone(R) and Its Metabolite, m-CPP, in Serum and Urine by HPLC

Abstract: A sensitive and rapid method for the analysis of trazodone (TZD) and its metabolite, 1-(m-chlorophenyl)piperazine (m-CPP), in the serum and urine of rabbits treated with the drug was developed. The assay requires extraction from the biological fluids with adequately buffered organic solvents followed by HPLC. The assay allows good reproducibility, fair recovery, and excellent linearity in the range of 0.6 to 10 micrograms/mL for TZD and 1.2 to 20 micrograms/mL for m-CPP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has a better extraction recovery percentage and a better precision than other methods for quantitative determination of trazodone in blood [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . The proposed method has extraction recoveries of trazodone from serum between 92.5 % and 96.7 %, whereas the method by Okhubo et al 19 showed extraction recoveries of 81.0 % to 84.2 %, and the method of RaviPrakash et al 16 had trazodone recoveries from blood between 36.1% and 40.8%.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results With Other Analytical Methods To Determentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This method has a better extraction recovery percentage and a better precision than other methods for quantitative determination of trazodone in blood [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . The proposed method has extraction recoveries of trazodone from serum between 92.5 % and 96.7 %, whereas the method by Okhubo et al 19 showed extraction recoveries of 81.0 % to 84.2 %, and the method of RaviPrakash et al 16 had trazodone recoveries from blood between 36.1% and 40.8%.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results With Other Analytical Methods To Determentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure enables the determination of trazodone using a very simple and fast liquidliquid extraction method, with a very good efficacy, having extraction recoveries between 92.5 % and 96.7 %, better than other methods to quantify trazodone in blood [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . The intra-day and inter-day variation of trazodone concentrations were in concordance with the precision criteria for an assay method for drugs in biological fluids [36][37][38][39] , and also were better than other methods to quantitative determination of trazodone in blood [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . Serum levels of trazodone at therapeutically efective doses (0.48-1.62 ng/μL) 1-3 are above the detection limit (0.016 ng/μL) and above the quantification limit (0.048 ng/ μL) for this method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation