2010
DOI: 10.2116/analsci.26.847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Urea in Serum Based on the Combination of an Enzymatic Reaction with Immobilized Urease and Ion Chromatographic Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1.0 and 5.0 lM urea were determined six times, with RSD of 3.5 and 2.6%, respectively. This method had good selectivity and sensitivity comparing with the reported method (Table 1) [1][2][3][4][5][21][22][23][24] and was one of the most sensitive methods for urea.…”
Section: Working Curvementioning
confidence: 86%
“…1.0 and 5.0 lM urea were determined six times, with RSD of 3.5 and 2.6%, respectively. This method had good selectivity and sensitivity comparing with the reported method (Table 1) [1][2][3][4][5][21][22][23][24] and was one of the most sensitive methods for urea.…”
Section: Working Curvementioning
confidence: 86%
“…In recent years, different analytical methods such as spectrophotometric method [5,[15][16][17] ion chromatography [9,18], high performance liquid chromatography [3,[19][20][21][22][23], gas chromatography mass spectrometry [24,25] reversed-phase liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry [26], high-performance liquid chromatography/isotope dilution mass spectrometry [27], liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [2,28] and chemiluminescence [29], liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry [30] for estimation of urea, creatinine and UA levels in human serum or plasma samples, as well as urine have been developed. This study aims to develop new and very simple methods to solve overlapping spectra in their ternary mixtures without preliminary separation steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these detection methods often have many disadvantages such as time-consuming detection and complex pretreatment process. The commonly used methods for urea detection include the electrochemical sensing method [12], flow injection method [13], ion chromatography [14], high performance liquid chromatography [15], and fluorescence spectroscopy [16], among others. These traditional methods are usually expensive and require complex instruments, as well as time-consuming and complex sample pretreatment process, making them unsuitable for field monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%