2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of water content in bee’s pollen samples by Karl Fischer titration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantity of water in bee pollen varies between 4 and 10%, and this water content ensures good preservation over time and the nondegradation of organic compounds, which consequently maintain original inherent properties (Gergen et al, 2006;Nogueira et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantity of water in bee pollen varies between 4 and 10%, and this water content ensures good preservation over time and the nondegradation of organic compounds, which consequently maintain original inherent properties (Gergen et al, 2006;Nogueira et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karl Fischer titration was performed according to the method proposed by Gergen et al (2006), using an automatic METROHM Titrino 785 titrator (Herisau, Switzerland). Titrations were performed using apura Titrant 5 (Merck) as the titrant and a mixture of methanol p.a.…”
Section: Karl Fischer Titrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Isengard, Schultheib, Radovic & Anklam (2001) and Isengard (2001), the Karl Fischer titration may be used as a reference method to determine the water content in products with a complex composition, such as bee pollen, provided that it is preceded by experiments to determine optimal conditions for analysis, such as the most appropriate extraction temperature, the best solvent to dissolve the sample, and the particle size of the sample (Gergen, Radu, Bordean & Isengard, 2006). The major advantages to this method are: measurements performed in a few minutes, minimum sample preparation, and no loss of volatile compounds (Bastos, Rocha, Cunha, Carvalho & Torres 2006;Bonvehi & Casanova, 1987;Gergen et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electrochemical approach is generally highly reliable; however, in some cases, especially for relatively small water concentrations and highly lipophilic, aprotic solvents, it may potentially be sensitive to, e.g., sample acquisition due to tendency of water to spontaneously accumulate close to more hydrophilic surfaces-e.g., glassware. This effect may result in inaccurate determination results (Dantan et al 2000;Gergen et al 2006). Moreover, the Karl Fischer titration method is difficult to be implemented as a part of, e.g., industrial or technological process, or to be used to continuously monitor any occurrence of water in sample media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%