1967
DOI: 10.1071/sr9670011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of withdrawal of water from soil by crop roots as a function of depth and time

Abstract: Theory is presented to permit the calculation of water withdrawal by plant roots at any depth in soil as a function of time, without neglect of water movement in the soil. Such neglect may be a source of error in using other approaches to this problem. The method proposed requires a knowledge of the moisture and hydraulic conductivity characteristics of the soil as a function of depth. When this theory was applied to data from an irrigated cotton crop, it was shown that the maximum rate of water withdrawal by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
12

Year Published

1970
1970
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
29
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…This sorption by the roots are given in Figure 3. Although the root absorption rate (r.) was greatest near the 75-cm depth, the maximal value of 3.5 X 10' day-' was quite low when compared with values reported for well watered soils (21,30). Since the soil matric potential at 75 cm was about -0.2 bars, the low extraction rate also suggests low root density or high root impedance to water transport at this depth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This sorption by the roots are given in Figure 3. Although the root absorption rate (r.) was greatest near the 75-cm depth, the maximal value of 3.5 X 10' day-' was quite low when compared with values reported for well watered soils (21,30). Since the soil matric potential at 75 cm was about -0.2 bars, the low extraction rate also suggests low root density or high root impedance to water transport at this depth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Gardner (1983) relacionou a distribuição radicular de sorgo medida com a estimada por modelo matemático e, já nesse trabalho, comentava sobre a dificuldade em obter uma boa estimativa da distribuição radicular a partir de amostras de solo. Rose & Stern (1967) fizeram uma análise completa e detalhada do consumo de água no solo pelas raízes de uma cultura. A aplicação do método proposto por esses autores é difícil, considerando a necessidade de uma caracterização físico-hídrica detalhada do perfil do solo.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…O método do balanço de água num volume de controle de solo tem sido apresentado por vários autores (Rose, 1966;Slatyer, 1967;Rose & Stern, 1967;Barrada, 1971;Reichardt et al, 1979, Guandique & Libardi, 1997Cintra et al, 2000), sendo seus componentes (precipitação, irrigação, evapotranspiração, deflúvio superficial, drenagem, ascensão capilar e variação da armazenagem de água no solo) apresentados numa forma integrada ou diferenciada numa equação geral de balanço de massa. Atualmente, a ênfase destes balanços tem sido dada à disponibilidade de água no solo relacionada com elementos climáticos e desenvolvimento vegetal.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The water flow through the roots q Root at each depth was calculated as the difference between total vertical flow and capillary flow (Rijtema, 1965;Rose and Stern, 1967;Feddes, 1971;Ehlers, 1975;Strebel et al, 1975): (Allen et al 1994) for a lysimeter with constant water level of 40 cm (3 and 7 days monitoring intervals) Table 5. Water balance components for a monitoring period of four weeks ET Grass = Grass reference Evapotranspiration after Allen et al, 1994 Period 15-21.7 22-28.7 29.7-5.8.…”
Section: Evapotranspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%