2019
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination, residue analysis, risk assessment and processing factors of tebufenozide in okra fruits under field conditions

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Ensuring the yield, quality, and profitability of okra by preventing and controlling pests with the application of insecticides has increased in the last decade. Some insecticide residues might remain in edible parts of okra (fruits) and lead to several potential human health problems. Therefore, research on the residue behaviour, risk assessment and removal approach of insecticides on okra fruits is important for food safety, together with the proper application and residual elimination of insecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficacy of the approach was assessed by the following factors: linearity, R 2 (coefficient of determination), matrix effect (ME), LOD, LOQ, recovery and RSD. [35][36][37] Linearity was determined by applying the standard solutions and matrix-matched standard solutions at seven concentrations (from 0.005 to 1 μg mL −1 ) for thiophanate-methyl and carbendazim. ME values were estimated from the following equation: ME = slope of matrix-matched standard calibration curve/slope of solvent standard calibration curve.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The efficacy of the approach was assessed by the following factors: linearity, R 2 (coefficient of determination), matrix effect (ME), LOD, LOQ, recovery and RSD. [35][36][37] Linearity was determined by applying the standard solutions and matrix-matched standard solutions at seven concentrations (from 0.005 to 1 μg mL −1 ) for thiophanate-methyl and carbendazim. ME values were estimated from the following equation: ME = slope of matrix-matched standard calibration curve/slope of solvent standard calibration curve.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acute and chronic dietary risks posed by thiophanate-methyl and carbendazim were determined from the following equations: 35,40 NESTI=FI×HR=b:w:…”
Section: Dietary Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LOD and LOQ were determined from a signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of 3 and the lowest spiked level (Ramasubramanian et al, 2012). The recovery experiments were carried out at three spiked concentrations (0.4, 4, and 50 μg/kg) to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the optimized method (Luo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An RQ value < 100% indicates the risk of the evaluated pesticide is acceptable risk to consumers, whereas RQ > 100% indicates an unacceptable risk to consumers. 26,27 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION…”
Section: Dietary Intake Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%