2020
DOI: 10.2112/si102-007.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determine the Stumpf 2003 Model Parameters for Multispectral Remote Sensing Shallow Water Bathymetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the initial value is unsuitable, the model parameters cannot be obtained. Therefore, according to the literature [4], [6], [10]- [14], the study of the ranges of initial values and how to give the ranges is very important for ensuring that the algorithm can return reliable parameters.…”
Section: B the Results Of The Initial Range For The Initial Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the initial value is unsuitable, the model parameters cannot be obtained. Therefore, according to the literature [4], [6], [10]- [14], the study of the ranges of initial values and how to give the ranges is very important for ensuring that the algorithm can return reliable parameters.…”
Section: B the Results Of The Initial Range For The Initial Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multispectral optical remote sensing imagery provides another way to quantitatively invert shallow water bathymetry [2], [3]. Compared with conventional acoustic and laser sounding, optical remote sensing has the advantages of a large coverage area, high efficiency and low cost and is an effective supplement to traditional sounding methods in areas that have complex underwater topography or are affected by maritime disputes [4]- [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water depth was manually measured by using simple tools in the past years; in the following years echosounding technique have been widely used in bathymetry surveys. In addition to the use of traditional methods for many years, RS technologies (Stumpf et al 2003a, b;Gao 2009;Jawak et al 2015;Zhu et al 2020) such as LIDAR (Quadros et al 2008;Mandlburger et al 2015;Pratomo et al 2019) and satellite-derived technology (AkgΓΌl et al 2018;Dewi et al 2019;Sagawa et al 2019) for bathymetry mapping have been used for not only depth estimation but also for getting environmental information with its analysis tools. Sediment-related problems have been mentioned in numerous studies (Zhou and Wu 2008;Wang and Hu 2009;Jain and Jain 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique provides low-cost, high-efficiency bathymetric surveys in shallow waters, meeting the requirements for short cycles and timeliness. [1][2][3][5][6][7][8][9] Water depth is estimated by SDB technology based on correlations between the remotely sensed reflectance values of satellite imagery observed with optical multispectral sensors and the water depth during image acquisition. While SDB can be generally applied to depths up to 20 m, it may only be applicable to depths of up to 10 m, depending on the characteristics of the marine region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the Stumpf logarithmic band ratio model estimates water depth using the reflectance ratio of the seabed to the water based on various experimental parameters. 3,8,9,[12][13][14] However, these models adopt empirical methodologies; consequently, the input values for depth estimation are variable between marine regions, impeding the construction of a universally applicable model. 3 Accordingly, recent research has actively focused on developing depth estimation models using various machine learning algorithms and independent satellite imagery to ensure universality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%