2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining 3D Kinematics of the Hip Using Video Fluoroscopy: Guidelines for Balancing Radiation Dose and Registration Accuracy

Abstract: The irradiation angle that minimizes the delivered dose does not necessarily correspond to the optimal angle for the accuracy in pose retrieval, for all rotations. For some applications, single-plane fluoroscopy may be a valid lower dose alternative to the dual-plane methods, despite their better accuracy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3DV was chosen to obtain the subject-specific motion: bi-plane 3DV could also be performed, but this would have implied a smaller overall motion of the lower limb, and higher doses to the volunteer [40]. As for the latter issue, in the specific case of single-plane 3DV methodology as that of the present study, the radiation dose exposure is generally more limited than using bi-plane systems; this might be further minimized in the future via more proper image acquisition angles, since it has been proved that the radiation doses may vary based on viewing angles of the fluoroscope [41]. The sensitivity of the model results with respect to the techniques used for MRI-CT and CT-3DV registration was not analysed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…3DV was chosen to obtain the subject-specific motion: bi-plane 3DV could also be performed, but this would have implied a smaller overall motion of the lower limb, and higher doses to the volunteer [40]. As for the latter issue, in the specific case of single-plane 3DV methodology as that of the present study, the radiation dose exposure is generally more limited than using bi-plane systems; this might be further minimized in the future via more proper image acquisition angles, since it has been proved that the radiation doses may vary based on viewing angles of the fluoroscope [41]. The sensitivity of the model results with respect to the techniques used for MRI-CT and CT-3DV registration was not analysed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This dataset is useful for standardized evaluation of the registration accuracy in orthopedic applications. and subject, and on the limits in delivered radiation exposure 55 . The dependence of the performance of a registration algorithm on the X-ray voltage can also be investigated with the proposed dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is based on established techniques of prosthesis component pose estimation, even during motion, which relies on good quality 2D fluoroscopy images and relevant detailed 3D CAD models. This technique was originally established for knee joint replacements [35,44] and has recently been extended to THAs [33,[40][41][42], though for a limited number of motor tasks. The large amount of literature in this area shows that the overall accuracy is smaller than 1 mm and 1 • , which is good enough for the conclusions of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows for the reconstruction of the absolute and relative position and orientation of the prosthesis components in 3D by using 2D-to-3D spatial matching [35]. This has been widely adopted for assessing the surface-to-surface interaction of prosthesis components in total joint replacement [35][36][37][38] and to a limited extent in THA [39][40][41][42]. However, single-plane VA has been demonstrated to be a good compromise between patient safety and measurement accuracy [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation