2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020gl087367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining Bathymetry of Shallow and Ephemeral Desert Lakes Using Satellite Imagery and Altimetry

Abstract: Water volume estimates of shallow desert lakes are the basis for water balance calculations, important both for water resource management and paleohydrology/climatology. Water volumes are typically inferred from bathymetry mapping; however, being shallow, ephemeral, and remote, bathymetric surveys are scarce in such lakes. We propose a new, remote-sensing-based, method to derive the bathymetry of such lakes using the relation between water occurrence, during >30 year of optical satellite data, and accurate ele… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, benefitting from the bathymetric capacity and much denser ground/bottom points, the simulated ICESat-2 data (based on the airborne MABEL data) [51,52] or measured ICESat-2 data [40,[53][54][55] were used to obtain the along-track underwater bottom points and further generate the bathymetric maps with satellite images, e.g., the Landsat, Sentinel-2, and GSWD (Global Surface Water Dataset) products [4]. Although these used datasets and some steps of the method (e.g., detecting the signal photons) are similar to this study, the specific applications and other steps (e.g., the data fusion) are quite different.…”
Section: Difference From Classical Studies Using Satellite Lidarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, benefitting from the bathymetric capacity and much denser ground/bottom points, the simulated ICESat-2 data (based on the airborne MABEL data) [51,52] or measured ICESat-2 data [40,[53][54][55] were used to obtain the along-track underwater bottom points and further generate the bathymetric maps with satellite images, e.g., the Landsat, Sentinel-2, and GSWD (Global Surface Water Dataset) products [4]. Although these used datasets and some steps of the method (e.g., detecting the signal photons) are similar to this study, the specific applications and other steps (e.g., the data fusion) are quite different.…”
Section: Difference From Classical Studies Using Satellite Lidarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a global level, such information can contribute significantly to the understanding of climate change [15] and the effects of human activities [16]. Furthermore, knowledge of water level variations (e.g., by altimetry time-series), in combination with surface water extent dynamics, enables the approximation of waterbody bathymetry, subsequently allowing the quantification of storage change [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Thus, essential water variables can be monitored, providing key indicators for the implementation of sustainable development goals [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the direct retrieval of bathymetry from satellite imagery is limited for situations in clear and shallow water bodies where the remotely detected signal is dominated by bottom reflected radiation (Carbonneau et al, 2006;Dilbone et al, 2018;Gao, 2009;Legleiter et al, 2009;Legleiter & Overstreet, 2012;Sandidge & Holyer, 1998). Alternatively, the topography can be estimated between the smallest and largest water surface areas using water level and flood extent data, such as the approaches presented by Feng et al (2011), Arsen et al (2013), Getirana et al (2018), Tseng et al (2016), Li et al (2019Li et al ( , 2020, and Armon et al (2020). These methods, however, have limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method proposed by Tseng et al (2017) only partly resolves these limitations by estimating the bottom levels on a pixel by pixel basis from a flood frequency map computed from multitemporal satellite images, but this approach does not account for the temporal variation of water surface elevation. Recently, other approaches were developed relating terrain elevation from the ICESat-2, sampled at specific points, and flood frequency (Armon et al, 2020) or water surface areas (Li et al, 2019(Li et al, , 2020 derived from a flood frequency map. However, these approaches also require adjustment of functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%