2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.127.151802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining Dark-Matter–Electron Scattering Rates from the Dielectric Function

Abstract: We show that the rate for dark matter-electron scattering in an arbitrary material is determined by an experimentally measurable quantity, the complex dielectric function, for any dark matter interaction that couples to electron density. This formulation automatically includes many-body effects, eliminates all systematic theoretical uncertainties on the electronic wavefunctions, and allows a direct calibration of the spectrum by electromagnetic probes such as infrared spectroscopy, X-ray scattering, and electr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(154 reference statements)
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Ref. [50], the lower limit of the DM-e − scattering cross section can reach σ e 8.4 × 10 −41 cm 2 for m X,N ∼ 20 MeV, and m Z ∼ 250 MeV. It can be transferred to g…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Ref. [50], the lower limit of the DM-e − scattering cross section can reach σ e 8.4 × 10 −41 cm 2 for m X,N ∼ 20 MeV, and m Z ∼ 250 MeV. It can be transferred to g…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We discuss some future investigations for the rSIMP model. Since the DM masses are about 20 MeV, the DM-e − scattering experiments can be used to test the allowed parameter space in this model [50][51][52][53]. According to Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Left: SI model with a light mediator (F med = (q0/q) 2 ), screened with the static dielectric shown in Fig 6 . The red solid (dashed) curve shows the constraints with (without) the inclusion of SOC effects. For comparison we also show projected constraints from single phonon excitations in GaAs (orange) and SiO2 (purple) computed with PhonoDark [56] (assuming an energy threshold of ωmin = 20 meV), electronic excitations in an aluminum superconductor [57] (brown), and previous estimates for ZrTe5 (teal) [25]. We also show the projected constraints combining the SOC energy levels with the No SOC wave functions, ("Partial SOC", red, dashed) to explicitly show the effect of the spin dependent wave functions.…”
Section: B Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…phonons or plasmons), and others. These types of effects have been studied recently in the context of laboratory experiments searching for the scattering of sub-GeV DM [31][32][33][34], but have mostly been ignored in existing treatments of DM scattering in stars. In this paper, we consider such effects systematically, and show that they can make parametrically large differences to DM capture rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%