2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab31d4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining dose enhancement factors of high-Z nanoparticles from simulations where lateral secondary particle disequilibrium exists

Abstract: Nanoparticles (NPs) containing high atomic number (high-Z) materials have been shown to enhance the radiobiological effectiveness of ionizing radiation. This effect is often attributed to an enhancement of the absorbed dose in the vicinity of the NPs, based on Monte Carlo simulations that show a significant local enhancement of the energy deposition on the microscopic scale. The results of such simulations may be significantly biased and lead to a severe overestimation of the dose enhancement if the condition … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this underestimation is corrected for, it will significantly decrease the dose enhancement factor. A quantitative reduction of DER by applying a real source geometry in simulation will be estimated by another work [64]. (2) Due to the confined beam used in the simulation, the contribution of Compton or Rayleigh scattered photons interacting with the nanoparticle is underestimated.…”
Section: Limitation Of the Present Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this underestimation is corrected for, it will significantly decrease the dose enhancement factor. A quantitative reduction of DER by applying a real source geometry in simulation will be estimated by another work [64]. (2) Due to the confined beam used in the simulation, the contribution of Compton or Rayleigh scattered photons interacting with the nanoparticle is underestimated.…”
Section: Limitation Of the Present Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,14,22,26 However, the enhancement is reduced at larger spatial scales when considering dose to water from the incident proton beam as well as the electrons emitted from the nanoparticle and secondary electron equilibrium effects. 35,36 The use of integrated enhancement factors provided a representative value for direct comparison of the evaluated nanoparticle geometries.…”
Section: Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dose-Enhancement Factor (DEF) reflects the additional contribution of irradiated PtNP to the secondary electron emission, as compared to the secondary electron emission after water irradiation alone. Thus, when calculating the DEF, this energy deposition ( Figure 7 B) must be taken into account, as there is a risk of overestimating this factor if it is not considered [ 13 ]. All the particles described above—both primary and secondary electrons—interact with the nanoparticles, and the resulting additional electrons that escape from the nanoparticle are thus those that will have a potential enhancement effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main peak, linked to the Auger emission, has a very low range. It has recently been reported [ 13 ] that, without taking into account the electron balance, i.e., when the beam of particles arriving in the nanoparticle has a size equivalent to the size of the nanoparticle, the DEF is very largely overestimated. In our study, the overestimation reaches a factor of 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation