2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2211.16732
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining Dust Properties in Protoplanetary Disks: SED-derived Masses and Settling With ALMA

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The marginalized distribution of ò (Figure 2(d)) shows a preference toward the lower end, indicating overall high levels of dust settling for our sample. This finding is consistent with previous work using SED modeling that has found that dust is depleted by up to 1000 times relative to the interstellar medium (Grant et al 2018;Ribas et al 2020) with the same levels of high depletion found in regions across the 1-10 Myr age range (Rilinger et al 2022). This evidence of significant dust settling supports that planet formation may may be well underway by 1 Myr.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The marginalized distribution of ò (Figure 2(d)) shows a preference toward the lower end, indicating overall high levels of dust settling for our sample. This finding is consistent with previous work using SED modeling that has found that dust is depleted by up to 1000 times relative to the interstellar medium (Grant et al 2018;Ribas et al 2020) with the same levels of high depletion found in regions across the 1-10 Myr age range (Rilinger et al 2022). This evidence of significant dust settling supports that planet formation may may be well underway by 1 Myr.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The median ratios between the SED-derived disk masses and the millimeter-derived disk masses for the entire sample at all ALMA wavelengths are 1.5-5.4 for Figures 4(a)-(c), and 1.5-2.1 in Figure 4(d). As also seen in Rilinger et al (2022), the discrepancy between the M (b), R disk (c), ò (d), a max,midplane (e), a max,upper (f), M disk (g), and M disk /M * (h). The error bars represent 16th and 84th percentiles.…”
Section: Comparison To Disk Dust Masses In the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation