2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining grain boundary energies from triple junction geometries without discretizing the five-parameter space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Simulations of the energy reconstruction process using a similar number of junctions and experimental uncertainties in the measured boundary orientation lead to the conclusion that the uncertainty of the energies is less than 0.03 relative units, and this uncertainty applies to all of the energies reported here. 25 The grain boundary character distribution, which is the relative areas of grain boundaries as a function of their five crystallographic parameters, was determined using a 3D reconstruction of the microstructure carried out in Dream.3D. 29 The pipelines used for the reconstruction are similar to the tutorial pipelines supplied with Dream.3D.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 Simulations of the energy reconstruction process using a similar number of junctions and experimental uncertainties in the measured boundary orientation lead to the conclusion that the uncertainty of the energies is less than 0.03 relative units, and this uncertainty applies to all of the energies reported here. 25 The grain boundary character distribution, which is the relative areas of grain boundaries as a function of their five crystallographic parameters, was determined using a 3D reconstruction of the microstructure carried out in Dream.3D. 29 The pipelines used for the reconstruction are similar to the tutorial pipelines supplied with Dream.3D.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The Morawiec method has recently been improved, mainly by eliminating the need to discretize the fiveparameter space of grain boundary types, and this new method will be applied here to YSZ. 25 The purpose of this paper is to report on the relative grain boundary energies of YSZ. The microstructure of a YSZ ceramic was mapped by 3D electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) using a dual beam-focused ion beam (DB-FIB) scanning electron microscope (SEM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such estimate for error is furnished by the work of Shen et al [74], who introduced a nondiscretizing approach to extract relative GB energies from polycrystalline samples using the locally optimal block preconditioned conjugate gradient method. Their approach utilizes regularization imposed on triple junction equilibrium equations and k-nearest neighbor distances.…”
Section: Experimental and Simulation Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again comparing the relevant constant-valued control model 18 to the validation function employed by Shen et al [74], we calculate a RMSE and MAE of 0.0976 J m −2 and 0.0466 J m −2 , respectively. This implies that the validation model used by Shen et al [74] is also simpler 19 than the BRK validation model employed in the present work.…”
Section: Experimental and Simulation Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation