2015
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining hydraulic properties of a loam soil by alternative infiltrometer techniques

Abstract: Testing infiltrometer techniques to determine soil hydraulic properties is necessary for specific soils. For a loam soil, the water retention and hydraulic conductivity predicted by the BEST (Beerkan Estimation of Soil Transfer parameters) procedure of soil hydraulic characterization was compared with data collected by more standard laboratory and field techniques. Six infiltrometer techniques were also compared in terms of saturated soil hydraulic conductivity, Ks. BEST yielded water retention values statisti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following similar investigations [37,52], unique values of clay, silt, sand, OC, ρ b , total porosity, macroporosity, microporosity and θ i were determined for each plot by averaging the measured values, considering the small size of the sampled areas [52]. The hypothesis of normal distribution of both the untransformed and the log-transformed K s data were tested by the Lilliefors test [53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following similar investigations [37,52], unique values of clay, silt, sand, OC, ρ b , total porosity, macroporosity, microporosity and θ i were determined for each plot by averaging the measured values, considering the small size of the sampled areas [52]. The hypothesis of normal distribution of both the untransformed and the log-transformed K s data were tested by the Lilliefors test [53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted a K s characterization using the Beerkan method [35], referred to as BEST. We chose the BEST test because it is a simple, fast and inexpensive method [36][37][38]. At each plot, we carried out seven infiltration runs using a steel ring with an inner diameter of 0.16 m inserted approximately 0.01 m into the soil surface, with a minimum distance between measurements of 2 m. Before the ring's insertion, the litter was removed and, if necessary, the grass and ground cover were cut in order to expose the soil surface.…”
Section: Soil Sampling and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hunter et al (2011) assessed the influence of disk size suggesting that the minidisk infiltrometer (MDI), having a 45 mm diameter disk, is appropriate for field assessment of SWR. In a recent investigation, the MDI proved to be a practical alternative to the classical tension infiltrometer to estimate hydrodynamic properties of a loam soil (Alagna et al, 2016). Furthermore, repellency assessment based on MDI tests appears inherently scaled to account for soil physical properties other than hydrophobicity (e.g., the volume, connectivity and the geometry of pores) that directly influence the hydrological processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OPD Verbist et al (2013) Method 2 by Wu et al (1999) Alagna et al (2016b TPD TPD, two-ponding depth approach by Reynolds and Elrick (1990); OPD, one-ponding depth approach by Reynolds and Elrick (1990). Ks and φm are given by (Reynolds and Elrick, 1990):…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%