2015
DOI: 10.1891/1061-3749.23.2.e67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining Intervention Fidelity From Chronological Field Notes

Abstract: Further research is needed on IF that would provide less intrusive an alternate method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, qualitative data used for this secondary analysis were from field notes written by peer interventionists in the parent studies (Enriquez & Cheng, 2016;Enriquez et al, 2015). Field note data are neither as reliable nor valid as audio-or video-taped data, but they were necessary because of the population's vulnerability and the need to foster the most optimal participantinterventionist relationship for collecting data (Dowell, Beeber, & Schwartz, 2015). The use of field notes as a qualitative methodology has occurred in research with vulnerable populations in the community (Lucero et al, 2016;Sebastian & Bushy, 1999).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, qualitative data used for this secondary analysis were from field notes written by peer interventionists in the parent studies (Enriquez & Cheng, 2016;Enriquez et al, 2015). Field note data are neither as reliable nor valid as audio-or video-taped data, but they were necessary because of the population's vulnerability and the need to foster the most optimal participantinterventionist relationship for collecting data (Dowell, Beeber, & Schwartz, 2015). The use of field notes as a qualitative methodology has occurred in research with vulnerable populations in the community (Lucero et al, 2016;Sebastian & Bushy, 1999).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%