2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17997-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining levels of linguistic deficit by applying cluster analysis to the aphasia quotient of Western Aphasia Battery in post-stroke aphasia

Abstract: The aphasia quotient of Western Aphasia Battery (WAB-AQ) has been used as an inclusion criterion and as an outcome measure in clinical, research, or community settings. The WAB-AQ is also commonly used to measure recovery. This study aimed to quantitatively determine levels of the linguistic deficit by using a cluster analysis of the WAB-AQ in post-stroke aphasia (PSA). 308 patients were extracted from the database. Cutoff scores are defined by mean overlap WAB-AQ scores of clusters by systematic cluster analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the evaluator provided scores of fluency and information content, which were added together to obtain the score of spontaneous speech, according to the scoring standards of WAB after the patient answered the questions. Combined with symptoms, medical history, and imaging data, stroke patients with a WAB-AQ lower than 93.8 points were judged as PSA, and the lower the WAB-AQ, the more severe the aphasia ( Kertesz and Poole, 2004 ; Yan et al, 2022a ). The secondary outcome measures included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), and Barthel Index (BI), which were selected to evaluate the cognitive function, motor function, and activities of daily living, respectively ( Shah et al, 1989 ; Gladstone et al, 2002 ; Nasreddine et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the evaluator provided scores of fluency and information content, which were added together to obtain the score of spontaneous speech, according to the scoring standards of WAB after the patient answered the questions. Combined with symptoms, medical history, and imaging data, stroke patients with a WAB-AQ lower than 93.8 points were judged as PSA, and the lower the WAB-AQ, the more severe the aphasia ( Kertesz and Poole, 2004 ; Yan et al, 2022a ). The secondary outcome measures included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), and Barthel Index (BI), which were selected to evaluate the cognitive function, motor function, and activities of daily living, respectively ( Shah et al, 1989 ; Gladstone et al, 2002 ; Nasreddine et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the evaluator provided scores of fluency and information content, which were added together to obtain the score of spontaneous speech, according to the scoring standards of WAB after the patient answered the questions. Combined with symptoms, medical history, and imaging data, stroke patients with a WAB-AQ lower than 93.8 points were judged as PSA, and the lower the WAB-AQ, the more severe the aphasia (Kertesz and Poole, 2004;Yan et al, 2022a). The secondary outcome measures included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), and Barthel Index (BI), which were selected to evaluate the cognitive function, motor function, and activities of daily living, respectively Gladstone et al, 2002;.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%