2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining major factors controlling phosphorus removal by promising adsorbents used for lake restoration: A linear mixed model approach

Abstract: Phosphorus (P) removal from lake/drainage waters by novel adsorbents may be affected by competitive substances naturally present in the aqueous media. Up to date, the effect of interfering substances has been studied basically on simple matrices (single-factor effects) or by applying basic statistical approaches when using natural lake water. In this study, we determined major factors controlling P removal efficiency in 20 aquatic ecosystems in the southeast Spain by using linear mixed models (LMMs). Two non-m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1. Main physic-chemical features of the P adsorbents used for this study. Concentrations (total and atomic surface) have been taken from Funes et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1. Main physic-chemical features of the P adsorbents used for this study. Concentrations (total and atomic surface) have been taken from Funes et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more detail, the underlying mechanism is that by one hand, MPs trap dissolved P with a minimal alteration in water quality (e.g. Funes et al, 2016Funes et al, , 2018 and on the other hand, P adsorbed on MPs can be desorbed, in basic solutions, and therefore recovered P can be eventually used as a fertilizer (Álvarez-Manzaneda et al, unpublished). Additional advantages of using MPs include: (i) high (18.83 mg P g -1 ) and fast (less than 1 h) maximum P adsorption capacity; (ii) their magnetic properties allows for recovery of MPs from solution by applying a magnetic separation gradient; (iii) the non-dependence on redox conditions of their P adsorption properties; (iv) their lower economic cost compared to other P adsorbents (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material should also allow the free passage of pore water and enable the recovery of the sorbed substances [21]. For the monitoring of DRP in agricultural waters using the passive sampling method, iron (oxyhydr)oxide coated anion exchange resin is an ideal adsorbent [22][23][24] since iron (oxyhydr)oxides can selectively and rapidly adsorb phosphate via inner-sphere complexation [25][26][27]. The objective of this study was to evaluate the passive sampling method using hybrid anion exchange resin bags to monitor the DRP loss in agricultural tile drainage water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, magnetite nanoparticles are employed as adsorbents for the separation and removal of Zn(II) ions and other contaminants by the application of external magnetic field (Maity and Agrawal 2007;Shirsath and Shirivastava 2015). Magnetite nanoparticles are preferred in metal removal applications due to their nanosize, magnetic separation capability, simple synthesis and coating technique and surface modification (Yargeau 2012;Ratnayaka et al 2009;Funes et al 2018;Dias et al 2011;Lasheen et al 2017;Achla and Singh 2017;Ibrahim et al 2018). Magnetic nanoparticles also find applications in drug-targeting to improve the therapeutic potential of many water-insoluble and unstable drugs (Pedro et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%