2007
DOI: 10.3934/ipi.2007.1.349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining nonsmooth first order terms from partial boundary measurements

Abstract: Abstract. We extend results of Dos Santos Ferreira-Kenig-Sjöstrand-Uhlmann (arXiv:math.AP/0601466) to less smooth coefficients, and we show that measurements on part of the boundary for the magnetic Schrödinger operator determine uniquely the magnetic field related to a Hölder continuous potential. We give a similar result for determining a convection term. The proofs involve Carleman estimates, a smoothing procedure, and an extension of the Nakamura-Uhlmann pseudodifferential conjugation method to logarithmic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due, in particular, to the fact that a reflection argument with respect to a boundary hyperplane leads to a magnetic potential which is in general only Lipschitz continuous. The construction of complex geometric optics solutions in this case is consequently more complicated, as already seen in [17] and [35].…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is due, in particular, to the fact that a reflection argument with respect to a boundary hyperplane leads to a magnetic potential which is in general only Lipschitz continuous. The construction of complex geometric optics solutions in this case is consequently more complicated, as already seen in [17] and [35].…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the presence of a magnetic potential, the inverse problem of determining the magnetic field and the electric potential from partial boundary measurements was addressed in [17], when γ 1 = ∂Ω and γ 2 is possibly a very small subset of the boundary, see also [35]. Under the assumption that A (1) = A (2) and q (1) = q (2) in a neighborhood of the boundary, in [7] it is proven that the magnetic field and the electric potential can be uniquely determined by boundary measurements, provided that γ 1 = ∂Ω and γ 2 is arbitrary.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last expression is related to a (nonlinear) two-plane transform of ∇ × (A 1 − A 2 ) over a set of two-planes. We may now apply the arguments in [7, Section 5] (see also [16,Section 7], where the last identity is the same as formula (40)). One first shows by complex analytic methods that the identity remains true with e i(φ 1 −φ 2 ) and g replaced by 1.…”
Section: Uniqueness Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CGO solutions constructed in this section have been applied to solve inverse boundary problems for the magnetic Schrödinger equation with different regularity in the coefficients [30], [35], [36], [42], [19], [26]. Also applications to an inverse boundary problem for linear elasticity are given in [31] (see also [7]).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%