Determining optimal values of performance indicators in different scenarios of on‐farm water management*

Abstract

In order to save water in the agricultural sector, the efficient use of irrigation water should be considered seriously by using appropriate performance indicators. In this research, the impact of on-farm water management factors (irrigation application efficiency [E a ] and water reduction fraction [WRF]) on the performance indicators net income (NI) and farm irrigation water productivity (WP) were assessed in different deficit irrigation scheduling scenarios (consists of deliberately applying irrigation depths smaller than those required), using response surface methodology. Pareto charts of the standardized effects showed that the factors of WRF and E a were the most important predictors influencing NI and WP, respectively. Considering multiple response predictions for simultaneous optimization of NI and WP, the maximum optimal values of NI obtained were 62.1 million rials (WP = 1.12, WRF = 0.33), 113.2 (WP = 0.76, WRF = 0.02), 32.2 (WP = 0.8, WRF = 0.19), 65.5 (WP = 0.66, WRF = 0.17), and 84.0 (WP = 0.34, WRF = 0.48) for winter wheat, rapeseed, barley, maize, and cotton, respectively. These values were obtained in E a = 90%, method 2 of deficit irrigation scheduling and sprinkler irrigation system. Using different deficit irrigation scheduling scenarios and irrigation systems resulted in on-farm water management packages for different conditions of water availability.

Alternative Techniques of Irrigation Water Management for Improving Crop Water Productivity

“…Therefore, the introduction of irrigation water management (IWM) is mandatory to compensate for the food demand expansion. The management of irrigation water used to produce a certain amount of agricultural production should be improved [8,9]. In this case, huge water may be needed to irrigate those agricultural areas.…”