2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-05990-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining patient needs to enhance exercise program implementation and uptake in rural settings for women after a cancer diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several intervention adaptations were made when adapting BEAT Cancer for rural women cancer survivors in a community site. The participant education materials (e.g., text, worksheets) were simplified and adapted for application to any cancer type (rather than only breast cancer) by original efficacy study research team members using literature review and our previously published stakeholder input (15)(16)(17). The community interventionists were informed of the program core components and their intent as follows: 1) group sessions for support, encouragement, accountability, and behavioral capability; 2) participant education materials for facilitating learning and engagement; 3) supervised exercise sessions for individualization, accountability, behavioral capability, selfefficacy, overcoming barriers, and identifying personally important benefits; 4) unsupervised exercise for self-efficacy and overcoming barriers; and 5) update physical activity counseling sessions for support, encouragement, individualization, positive reinforcement, and overcoming barriers.…”
Section: Intervention Description and Adaptations During Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several intervention adaptations were made when adapting BEAT Cancer for rural women cancer survivors in a community site. The participant education materials (e.g., text, worksheets) were simplified and adapted for application to any cancer type (rather than only breast cancer) by original efficacy study research team members using literature review and our previously published stakeholder input (15)(16)(17). The community interventionists were informed of the program core components and their intent as follows: 1) group sessions for support, encouragement, accountability, and behavioral capability; 2) participant education materials for facilitating learning and engagement; 3) supervised exercise sessions for individualization, accountability, behavioral capability, selfefficacy, overcoming barriers, and identifying personally important benefits; 4) unsupervised exercise for self-efficacy and overcoming barriers; and 5) update physical activity counseling sessions for support, encouragement, individualization, positive reinforcement, and overcoming barriers.…”
Section: Intervention Description and Adaptations During Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-efficacy barriers (cancer survivor confidence in overcoming exercise barriers) were assessed using a nine-item scale previously used with cancer survivors (30). A walking task selfefficacy scale included six items to assess a cancer survivor's confidence in her ability to walk at a moderately fast pace for several durations (5,10,15,20,25, and 30 min) (31). The Likert scale was used, and scale items were averaged to calculate both barriers and walking task self-efficacy with a possible range of 0% (not at all confident) to 100% (extremely confident).…”
Section: Social Cognitive Theory Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, such a system would be able to reduce perceived negative aspects of exercise such as cost, transportation, weather, inconvenience, lack of flexibility of courses and safety [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the COVID-19 pandemic, future programmes should be oriented towards mixed or bi-modal interventions which include both face-to-face and online supervision depending on patient’s preferences [ 49 ] and demographics [ 50 ]. In addition, implementing technology-supported interventions [ 51 ] may allow to offer this service to a greater number of patients in those cases in which supervision is less required [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%