2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining pesticide foliar half-lives from soil half-life value: Not so “cut-and-dry”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DFR at time t (days after application), DFR t , was calculated using a first-order degradation equation (S. Kegley, G. Keating, E. Conlisk, S. Stahlman 2013, unpublished report), adapted from Durkin et al [26]:The DT 50foliar , dislodgeable foliar half-life of the pesticide (days), was calculated according to Thomas et al [35] using the pesticide soil half-life, DT 50soil (days), as follows:The TR on a given day t after application, TR t , is calculated from the DFR available on the same day.The adult working day of 8 h was determined from the survey. Playing time for the child was determined by field observations and conversations with ENDA and FAO staff.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DFR at time t (days after application), DFR t , was calculated using a first-order degradation equation (S. Kegley, G. Keating, E. Conlisk, S. Stahlman 2013, unpublished report), adapted from Durkin et al [26]:The DT 50foliar , dislodgeable foliar half-life of the pesticide (days), was calculated according to Thomas et al [35] using the pesticide soil half-life, DT 50soil (days), as follows:The TR on a given day t after application, TR t , is calculated from the DFR available on the same day.The adult working day of 8 h was determined from the survey. Playing time for the child was determined by field observations and conversations with ENDA and FAO staff.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, up until the late 2000s, data was sparse, and for many applications it was estimated from the soil halflife or via vegetation models; approaches that would undoubtedly have had implications for the study outcomes [21][22]. Although there is now a considerable number of published studies available, and the number is increasing year on year, the data is still problematic to identify; the main issue being the amount of time needed to source the data, which is scattered within published scientific literature, and subsequently understand its variability and parameter sensitivity such that the most appropriate value can be used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that the importance of this type of data for risk assessments has been evident for many years, the data is not routinely reported in any of the main reference sources [17][18][19][20], nor is it normally part of the data package reported and used to support the regulatory authorisation process undertaken by the European Commission, US EPA or many other regulatory bodies in the developed world where there are comprehensive and sophisticated risk assessment processes in place. Indeed, up until the late 2000s, data was sparse, and for many applications it was estimated from the soil half-life or via vegetation models; approaches that would undoubtedly have had implications for the study outcomes [21,22]. Although there is now a considerable number of published studies available, and the number is increasing year on year, the data is still problematic to identify; the main issue being the amount of time needed to source the data, which is scattered within published scientific literature, and subsequently understand its variability and parameter sensitivity such that the most appropriate value can be used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%