2019
DOI: 10.1038/s42254-019-0113-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining random lasing action

Abstract: | Random lasing -for which disorder is exploited to enhance stimulated emissionhas emerged as a paradigmatic phenomenon of complex lasers. Random lasers feature unique properties such as tunable coherence and reconfigurable spectral emission. Nevertheless, their complexity sets them apart from conventional lasers, making it challenging to determine whether random lasing is occurring. In this Expert Recommendation, I discuss experimental methods required to properly assess and demonstrate random lasing action.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
91
1
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
91
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Different from the WGM laser made by incorporating the wr-PNDs in the microcavity as demonstrated above, the powder sample itself can work as a random laser without the need of optical coupling with an external cavity resonator 38 . In general, random lasing does not require a well-confined laser cavity but relies on multiple light scattering in a disordered scattering medium [39][40][41] . As a result, random lasers have lower coherence than the lasers based on optical cavities, thus ensuring their application in speckle-free imaging and bioimaging 42 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from the WGM laser made by incorporating the wr-PNDs in the microcavity as demonstrated above, the powder sample itself can work as a random laser without the need of optical coupling with an external cavity resonator 38 . In general, random lasing does not require a well-confined laser cavity but relies on multiple light scattering in a disordered scattering medium [39][40][41] . As a result, random lasers have lower coherence than the lasers based on optical cavities, thus ensuring their application in speckle-free imaging and bioimaging 42 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the analyzed devices are characterized by a stimulated emission with sharp lasing peaks, typical of RLs with coherent feedback. [ 2 ] It is possible to obtain an estimate of the coherence time τ c of a RL peak from the spectral linewidth Δλ according to the expression τnormalc ≈ λ2cΔλ, where λ is the central emission wavelength and c is the speed of light in vacuum. In the case of a RL peak with 0.4 nm linewidth, the estimated τ c is ≈3 ps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 ] The spectral features of a RL arise from the delicate balance between the optical gain and the scattering efficiency of the disordered matrix, that can provide two different feedback mechanisms. [ 2 ] Non‐resonant feedback results in the enhancement and narrowing of the fluorescence emission spectrum of the gain material, while resonant feedback gives rise to coherent emission spectra with distinguishable lasing peaks whose number and frequencies are typical of the scattering material. The absence of an optical cavity with a well‐defined geometry, essential for obtaining feedback in conventional lasers, opens up to various fabrication strategies for the realization of RL devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 A random laser is an optical device based on an active molecular layer in which defects, aggregates or external beads act as scattering centers inducing light amplification. 22 As depicted in Figure 8, the patterning of the light emitter T5OCx, achieved by spontaneous molecular self-assembly driven by STD lithography, induces the formation of well-defined nanoaggregates in spatially restricted environments. Ring, stripe and pixel microarray structures were realized by depositing few microliters of a solution of T5OCx in dichloromethane on different stamps used asgeometrical constraints (Figure 8b-j).…”
Section: Random Laser From T5coxmentioning
confidence: 99%