2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining roof surfaces suitable for the installation of PV (photovoltaic) systems, based on LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data, pyranometer measurements, and distribution network configuration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, this study assumed that there was more than enough non-shaded optimal surface area to allow for distributed generation with PV, but it did not explicitly calculate siting for the 1544 GW of PV necessary to replace all of fossil fuel electricity production in the U.S. The nuances of territory and siting at both the large scale for PV output [115], as well as DG benefits [116,117] and roof top [118][119][120][121][122] as well as façade [123] locations have been covered extensively. Here, the conservative assumption about locating the PV systems was based on a distributed generation model where the PV would be located following population density in each state across the U.S.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, this study assumed that there was more than enough non-shaded optimal surface area to allow for distributed generation with PV, but it did not explicitly calculate siting for the 1544 GW of PV necessary to replace all of fossil fuel electricity production in the U.S. The nuances of territory and siting at both the large scale for PV output [115], as well as DG benefits [116,117] and roof top [118][119][120][121][122] as well as façade [123] locations have been covered extensively. Here, the conservative assumption about locating the PV systems was based on a distributed generation model where the PV would be located following population density in each state across the U.S.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also in the case of PV, the work of Lukač et al [107] in 2014 and Jakubiec and Reinhardt [111] in 2013 (presented in the section of only GIS-based estimations of PV potential) described methodologies which were already able to generate PV potential data in high spatiotemporal resolution for entire cities, but they did not make further use of the data. It was only in 2016 that Srećković et al [172] extended the methodology of Lukač et al [107] to improve the evaluation of suitability of surfaces for PV. These authors included the high temporal resolution energy output of every potential surface and the electricity demand profiles of buildings in a distribution network model to assess which of the installations would lead to the highest reduction of network losses per year.…”
Section: Spatiotemporal Modelling For Renewable Energy Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second main challenge is to consider integration of the determined PV potentials into the energy system. Although this has already been done by some PV studies, for example, by Mainzer et al., Killinger et al., Srećković et al., and Wegertseder et al., these aspects are typically not considered by wind potential studies. So there is definitely scope to improve these methods, for example, by using real network topology and load flow data and/or also modeling other end‐use sectors.…”
Section: Decentralized Energy‐system Modeling Of Low Carbon Technologmentioning
confidence: 99%