2018
DOI: 10.1037/met0000172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining synchrony between behavioral time series: An application of surrogate data generation for establishing falsifiable null-hypotheses.

Abstract: Synchrony between interacting systems is an important area of nonlinear dynamics in physical systems. Recently psychological researchers from multiple areas of psychology have become interested in nonverbal synchrony (i.e., coordinated motion between two individuals engaged in dyadic information exchange such as communication or dance) as a predictor and outcome of psychological processes. An important step in studying nonverbal synchrony is systematically and validly differentiating synchronous systems from n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A final, quite important step in our analysis was to rule out that the detected synchrony could have occurred solely by chance: Comparing synchrony with so‐called pseudosynchrony provides an estimate of the strength of the synchrony phenomenon (Moulder, Boker, Ramseyer, & Tschacher, ; Ramseyer & Tschacher, ). We therefore included a procedure that generated N = 5,000 surrogate datasets (out of a possible N = 7,320) by permuting the allocation of interviewers and subjects across all available dyads ( N = 31) in a yoked control design.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A final, quite important step in our analysis was to rule out that the detected synchrony could have occurred solely by chance: Comparing synchrony with so‐called pseudosynchrony provides an estimate of the strength of the synchrony phenomenon (Moulder, Boker, Ramseyer, & Tschacher, ; Ramseyer & Tschacher, ). We therefore included a procedure that generated N = 5,000 surrogate datasets (out of a possible N = 7,320) by permuting the allocation of interviewers and subjects across all available dyads ( N = 31) in a yoked control design.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore included a procedure that generated N = 5,000 surrogate datasets (out of a possible N = 7,320) by permuting the allocation of interviewers and subjects across all available dyads ( N = 31) in a yoked control design. This strategy is different from another approach (Ramseyer & Tschacher, ), but provides more randomized pairings in situations with few patients and short observations (see Moulder et al , ). Our choice of lags up to ±3 s was based on the empirical comparison of synchrony versus pseudosynchrony, namely the crossing points of genuine synchrony and pseudosynchrony (Tschacher, Ramseyer, & Koole, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods exist by which spurious correlations can be controlled for. One possibility is the use of surrogate/virtual pairs-that is, time series pairs that are split and randomly recombined (Louwerse et al, 2012;Moulder, Boker, Ramseyer, & Tschacher, 2018). Synchrony determined within these surrogate pairs can be used as a baseline to evaluate the meaningfulness of genuine synchrony.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SuSy was implemented in R version 3.0.2, in strict analogy to previous projects (Ramseyer & Tschacher, 2011;Tschacher et al, 2014). Surrogate tests (Moulder, Boker, Ramseyer, & Tschacher, 2018) are especially important because times series are (by definition) serially dependent data sets, which means they are often autocorrelated. Autocorrelation may, e.g., result from trend-like behavior of EDA values.…”
Section: Surrogate Synchronymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, "synchrony" in one study may not equal "synchrony", "attunement", "coupling", or like phenomena in another study. There are various options for synchrony computation as well as for surrogate testing (Moulder et al, 2018;Palumbo et al, 2017;Ramseyer & Tschacher, 2010). Different methodological choices can entail a marked impact on the results of a study.…”
Section: / 727mentioning
confidence: 99%