2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the boundaries, structure and volume of buried shell matrix deposits using ground-penetrating radar: A case study from northern Australia

Abstract: Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is used in this study to delineate the extent and internal structure of a large late Holocene buried shell matrix site at Thundiy, Bentinck Island, northern Australia. Shell matrix sites comprise a key component of the coastal archaeological record. The extensive nature of many shell matrix sites presents challenges for archaeological sampling regimes. While large-scale excavation is undesirable and impractical, limited test pits often represent only a tiny fraction of large shel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The landscape profile also has the potential to show likely locations for middens. Middens may be detectable using ERT, further increasing the potential for ERT investigation of the floodplains for site detection [ 82 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The landscape profile also has the potential to show likely locations for middens. Middens may be detectable using ERT, further increasing the potential for ERT investigation of the floodplains for site detection [ 82 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of the GPR data processing is transforming raw data to be zero offset. Hence, we should rewrite the equation (22) to equation (23) in order to get the electric field at the depth of z…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Concealed Geological Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study employs both GPR and electrical resistivity to transform the survey results into volume estimates and 3D models of the deposits using a methodology that is detailed in Kenady, Lowe, and Ulm () and Kenady (). The methods were tested under experimental conditions so that results from the modelling could be compared to the actual in‐ground deposits to test each geophysical method's accuracy in generating volume calculations and 3D models of the buried shell deposits.…”
Section: Summary Of Geophysical Studies Investigating Shell Matrix Simentioning
confidence: 99%