2013
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.12143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the effect of environmental accidents on responses to a Gulf of Mexico recreational for‐hire fishing industry surveya

Abstract: A survey designed to collect economic, attitudinal and policy data from the recreational for-hire (RFH) fishing industry in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico was conducted before and during the largest marine oil spill in U.S. history (the April 2010 Deepwater Horizon blowout). Respondents were grouped into two time periods based on when the survey was completed, where the break in groups was determined through the examination of the Pew Research Center's media coverage index and the per cent of fishing area closures du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The papers can be divided into five sub‐sections: those dealing with the biology of species or ecosystems (Begoña Santos et al , ; McIntyre et al , ; Righton & Walker ), those specifically tackling issues of biology which bear on the management of exploited species (Eno et al , ; Gilman et al , ; Perez et al , ; Pranovi et al , ), a group of five papers on management issues (Arkhipkin et al , ; Florin et al , ; Houle et al , ; Pitcher et al , ; Rätz et al , ), a section dealing with the increasing involvement of stakeholders in both science and management (Armstrong et al , ; Cooke et al , ; Field et al , ; Kraan et al , ; Savolainen et al , ) and finally two papers examining fish as a raw material for industry or human consumption (Beveridge et al , ; Shepherd & Jackson ). This eclectic range of subjects reflects the diversity of the congress, although it does not capture the detailed breakdown of fisheries science as represented by the full programme.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The papers can be divided into five sub‐sections: those dealing with the biology of species or ecosystems (Begoña Santos et al , ; McIntyre et al , ; Righton & Walker ), those specifically tackling issues of biology which bear on the management of exploited species (Eno et al , ; Gilman et al , ; Perez et al , ; Pranovi et al , ), a group of five papers on management issues (Arkhipkin et al , ; Florin et al , ; Houle et al , ; Pitcher et al , ; Rätz et al , ), a section dealing with the increasing involvement of stakeholders in both science and management (Armstrong et al , ; Cooke et al , ; Field et al , ; Kraan et al , ; Savolainen et al , ) and finally two papers examining fish as a raw material for industry or human consumption (Beveridge et al , ; Shepherd & Jackson ). This eclectic range of subjects reflects the diversity of the congress, although it does not capture the detailed breakdown of fisheries science as represented by the full programme.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%